On Jul 24, 8:28=A0am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > On Jul 23, 10:50 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> Rupert wrote:
> >>> On Jul 23, 5:08 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>> ****wit is only interested in animals for himself. =A0He
> >>>> likes "meat...gravy." =A0"aras" confront him with a truth
> >>>> that ****wit cannot address: =A0that ****wit's
> >>>> consumption of "meat...gravy" harms animals interests.
> >>>> =A0 ****wit *wants* to take the "aras'" case apart, but
> >>>> he can't. =A0Instead, he tries to beat them at their own
> >>>> game, by imagining a *new* right or interest held
> >>>> by...non-existent animals. =A0It falls completely flat,
> >>>> because a) it's patently absurd; =A0b) it has already
> >>>> been demolished, over a century ago; =A0and c) ****wit is
> >>>> too sophomorically inept to have any hope of making it
> >>>> work.
> >>>> The entire thing, nine years of wasted time, was just
> >>>> ****wit trying to justify HIS pursuit of HIS interest.
> >>>> ****wit does not care and never cared about animals'
> >>>> well-being. =A0He just wants "meat...gravy."
> >>> You can't make any credible case against animal rights either.
> >> I can and have.
>
> > Show us where.
>
> Thousands of posts, in alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian and
> talk.politics.animals, going back to 1999. =A0Browse around a bit.-
Humor us Boobs and re-post one.........if you can find one.
|
