Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Animals > Re: Pre-existen...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 52 of 67 Topic 5628 of 6288
Post > Topic >>

Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???

by dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jul 24, 2008 at 03:36 PM

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 Goo feebly muttered:

>On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:46:01 -0100, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Goo lied incredibly obviously:
>>
>>>dh challenged
>>>:
>>>> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:28:52 GMT, Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 pointed out:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:29:55 GMT, Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> The Logic of the Larder was defeated in 1914. Many legitimate
arguments 
>>>>>>> exist for the humane use of animals, LoL (aptly) is not one of
them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "It is often said, as an excuse for the slaughter of animals, that
it is 
>>>>>>> better for them to live and to be butchered than not to live at
all. " - Salt
>>
>>>>>>     Only to people who believe that experiencing a decent life of 
>>>>>> positive value is better than not experiencing it, 
>>
>>>>> It's an illegitimate argument. The wish is so obviously father to
the 
>>>>> thought...
>>>> 
>>>>     Try explaining how you think that prevents livestock from
>>>> benefitting from their lives.
>>>
>>>Never were talking about that
>>
>>"NO livestock benefit from being farmed." - Goo
>>
>>"No farm animals benefit from farming." - Goo
>>
>>"when it moves from "pre-existence" into the life we 
>>can detect, we cannot conclude that life is a benefit 
>>to it." - Goo
>>
>>"No farm animals benefit from farming." - Goo
>>
>>"Life -per se- NEVER is a "benefit" to animals or 
>>even to humans" - Goo
>>
>>"Life is not a "benefit" to livestock or any other 
>>animals." - Goo
>>
>>""Life", by which you mean coming into existence, is 
>>not a benefit at all" - Goo
>>
>>"I have examined the question at length, and feel 
>>there is only one reasonable conclusion:  life, per se, 
>>is not a benefit." - Goo
>>
>>"coming into existence didn't make me better off than 
>>I was before." - Goo
>>
>>"Life is not a gain" - Goo
>
>All true statements above

    How can you think we were never talking about
whether or not existing beings benefit from their own
existence, when all of your above claims are in
regards to that very thing, Goo?
 




 67 Posts in Topic:
GooFuckwit and animal "pre-existence"
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2007-09-17 09:24:43 
Re: GooFuckwit and animal "pre-existence"
Derek <usenet.email@[E  2007-09-17 22:32:10 
Re: GooFuckwit and animal "pre-existence"
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-09-19 14:20:25 
Re: GooFuckwit and animal "pre-existence"
Rudy Canoza <rudy-cano  2007-09-19 11:55:16 
Re: GooFuckwit and animal "pre-existence"
The Voice of Reason <d  2007-09-19 19:50:13 
Re: GooFuckwit and animal "pre-existence"
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-09-18 04:41:26 
Hilarious denial by a desperate Goober
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-09-19 14:15:15 
Re: GooFuckwit lies, again, and gets caught, again
Rudy Canoza <rudy-cano  2007-09-19 11:45:35 
Re: Stumbling bumbling dog-blowing cracker, David Harrison - aka
Rudy Canoza <rudy-cano  2007-09-19 11:54:16 
Re: Stumbling bumbling dog-blowing cracker, David Harrison - aka
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-06-18 23:27:32 
¿Pre-existence prevents life from being a benefit?
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-19 17:10:38 
=?Windows-1252?Q?Re:_=BFPre-existence_prevents_life_from_being_a
"Dutch" <no@  2008-06-19 21:27:49 
Re: ¿Pre-existence prevents life from being a benefit?
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-24 16:12:04 
Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BFPre-existence_prevents_life_from_b?=
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-06-24 13:16:43 
Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BFPre-existence_prevents_life_from_b?=
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-25 00:01:38 
Re: ¿Pre-existence prevents life from being a benefit?
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-26 13:04:23 
Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BFPre-existence_prevents_life_from_b?=
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-26 18:53:29 
Re: ¿Pre-existence prevents life from being a benefit?
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-01 11:37:19 
Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BFPre-existence_prevents_life_from_b?=
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-07-01 09:15:12 
Re: ¿Pre-existence prevents life from being a benefit?
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-03 12:34:35 
Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BFPre-existence_prevents_life_from_b?=
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-07-03 09:59:27 
Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BFPre-existence_prevents_life_from_b?=
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-07-01 19:55:08 
Re: ¿Pre-existence prevents life from being a benefit?
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-03 12:30:14 
Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BFPre-existence_prevents_life_from_b?=
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-07-03 09:58:40 
Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BFPre-existence_prevents_life_from_b?=
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-06-26 23:41:48 
Re: ¿Pre-existence prevents life from being a benefit?
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-01 12:24:41 
Re: Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison - believes in "pre-existence"
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-06-20 00:36:36 
Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
David <dh@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-07-09 11:29:26 
Re: Stumbling bumbling dog-blowing cracker, David Harrison - aka
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-07-09 08:44:57 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-07-10 20:18:37 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-10 17:17:57 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-07-10 23:22:37 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-16 14:00:22 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-07-16 21:23:26 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-17 14:33:08 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-07-17 13:18:01 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-21 12:05:44 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-07-21 10:01:26 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-22 11:14:13 
Re: pig-fucker Goo Fuckwit David Harrison's "pre-existent entiti
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-07-22 22:38:33 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-07-17 08:31:03 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-17 14:35:10 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-07-17 19:29:55 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-21 12:06:41 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-07-21 10:04:22 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-07-21 20:28:52 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-22 11:16:16 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-07-22 19:34:32 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-07-22 22:40:00 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-23 12:46:01 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-07-23 13:43:36 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-24 15:36:20 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-07-24 13:57:22 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-29 12:05:50 
Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining Fuckwit's life
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-07-29 14:07:18 
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_=BFPre=2Dexistence_prevents_life_from_being
J <jquebecois@[EMAIL P  2008-06-19 18:11:44 
Re: Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison - believes in "pre-existence"
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-20 02:01:40 
Re: Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison - believes in "pre-existence"
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-24 16:28:00 
Re: Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison - "I am talking about non-exist
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-06-24 13:44:48 
Re: Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison - "I am talking about non-exist
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-26 13:01:37 
Re: Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison - "I am talking about non-exist
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-06-26 11:55:59 
Re: Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison - "I am talking about non-exist
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-26 21:20:15 
Re: Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison - "I am talking about non-exist
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-06-26 15:12:14 
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_=BFPre=2Dexistence_prevents_life_from_being
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-27 03:25:34 
Re: Stumbling bumbling dog-blowing cracker, David Harrison - aka
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-07-09 17:52:01 
Re: Stumbling bumbling dog-blowing cracker, David Harrison - aka
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-10 17:33:48 
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_=BFPre=2Dexistence_prevents_life_from_being
wait and see <wormhole  2008-07-24 13:06:05 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 8:17:42 CST 2008.