Re: Who likes Bush ?

On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:28:36 -0600, "D. A. Tsenuf" <DA@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>>
>> As you have said before, profanity gives those with a larger
>> vocabulary a reason to discount the substance of what people with no
>> vocabulary say.
>>
>
>Now there's a logical mistake
>Use of profanity in no way indicates the size of the vocabulary of the 
>user...

With the exception that profanity is often used because the user is
unable to think of another word.

>> That actually makes sense if you think about it.  But in this case you
>> would be mistaken.  There are two trains of thought.  The first of
>> which would be it is not about what you say but how you say it.  And
>> then you have it is not how you say but what you say.
>>
>
>That's a lot of words to basically say very little.

Yes, I know.  That kind of was the point.

>> It is actually a combination of both because there is misuse of
>> vocabulary to impart meanings that are not accurate so much so that
>> the meanings of words is so bastardized that what you say has little
>> or no meaning in that the meaning is never clear.
>>
>
>More words to say little.

You might reread that one.



-- 
Mark Ferguson
outing them ole spammers
http://www.whew.com/spammers/Outed/