Re: ** Anyone cracked CryptoSMS yet ? **

>
> That was an attack on the user's pass-phrases, as CryptoSMS
> failed to utilize such basic protections as salting.
>

That was an attack based on extremely faulty assumptions,
as was pointed out by many experts at the time.  BTW,
which incarnation of Cryptosms are you speaking about?

   http://www.cryptosms.org
   http://www.cryptosms.com
   http://www.novamedia.es/pdf/CryptoSMS_ds_2311_ES.pdf

Perhaps it would be useful to distinguish between these.

(Disclaimer: I'm not associated with Cryptosms, 
just a satisfied customer.)


>
> CryptoSMS has a market share indistinguishable from zero,
> so attacks on users' pass-phrases remain theoretical.
>


All three of those products have fairly significant market
shares, if one is judging by the number of downloads, the
number of users, and the number of sites which provide the
software.

If one considers his responses to be of value, being specific 
about from where one obtained his numbers is considerably
im****tant.