ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'

Expect Claude (David Raynes) of the National Drug Prevention Alliance
(NDPA: http://www.drugprevent.demon.co.uk/)
to be along shortly to libel
the members of the ACMD again.

Find out more here:
http://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2008/03/24/talking-about-cannabis-the-scientology-link/



Cannabis 'should remain class C'

The official body which advises the government on drugs policy has decided
cannabis should remain a class C drug, the BBC understands.

The Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs' decision appears to go
against the view of Gordon Brown, who seems to favour returning the drug
to class B.

The government asked the council to review cannabis's legal status amid
concerns over stronger forms of it.

The council refused to confirm or deny a decision.

Chairman Professor Sir Michael Rawlins said a re****t would be sent to Home
Secretary Jacqui Smith later this month.

The expected decision has caused concern among mental health charities who
say skunk, a stronger form of the drug, can trigger psychotic breakdowns,
hallucinations and paranoia.

University study

BBC home affairs correspondent Danny Shaw said the decision was taken at a
private meeting of the council, which discussed some significant new
research from Keele University about links between cannabis and mental
illness.

The study found nothing to sup****t a theory that rising cannabis use in
the 1970s, 1980s and early 1990s led to increases in the incidence of
schizophrenia later on.


MAXIMUM DRUG PENALTIES
Class A: Seven years for possession, life for supplying Class B: Five
years for possession, 14 for supplying Class C: Two years for possession,
14 for supplying

The Advisory Council's decision leaves the government in an awkward
position, our correspondent adds.

Gordon Brown has indicated he favours transferring cannabis back to class
B to send a message about the dangers of the drug, particularly to
teenagers.

At a news conference earlier this week, he said that - given the changing
nature of cannabis and the greater damage being caused - there was a
stronger case for sending out a signal that cannabis was not only illegal,
but unacceptable.

If the government does reclassify, it would be rejecting the findings of
the Advisory Council's panel of 23 drug experts, which has never happened
before on a decision about drug classification.

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said she would not comment on the review until
she had received it.

Mass criminalisation

Cannabis was downgraded from a class B drug to class C in January 2004.

The move was designed to free up police time and allow officers to
concentrate on tackling harder drugs.

However, as a class C drug, people still face up to two years in prison if
caught in possession. People found to be carrying a class B drug can be
given a five-year sentence.

Steve Rolles, of the Drugs Policy Foundation, Transform, said increasing
jail sentences from two years to five was not the best way to send a
strong signal to teenagers about the dangers of the drug.

"Rather than mass criminalisation of millions of young people, the best
way would be to invest in effective, targeted public health education, "
he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

He said current estimates suggested 2 million people in the country were
regular cannabis users, 4 million dabble occasionally and 6 million have
tried it.

Mental health charity Sane was one group which gave evidence to the
advisory group.

Marjorie Wallace, the charity's chief executive, said not enough was yet
known about the direct links between cannabis and the brain, particularly
the developing brain.

She said she has heard of hundreds of cases where people have smoked
cannabis heavily, in particular the stronger form of skunk, and gone on to
suffer psychotic breakdowns, hallucinations, paranoia and feelings of
fear.

"Young people are literally dicing with their minds and futures," she told
BBC News.

"And if you have ever seen someone who has taken heavy cannabis and gone
on a trip from which they have never really returned and you have seen the
collateral damage to them and their families, then you have to look at it
from that point of view."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7327702.stm

-- 
Dr John Watson
Baker Street