In message <proto-D8B410.10082230012008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Walter Bushell <proto@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
>In article <mn.14e67d81d53e6198.81063@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Baldoni <baldoniXXV@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Phil Stovell formulated the question :
>> > On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:35:26 +0000, Hiram B Culpeper wrote:
>> >
>> >> "OM ****VA!108" <grimus108@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >>
news:7bc64493-8612-4569-ac13-1c548eb53aea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/uklatest/story/0,,-7191426,00.html
>> >>>
>> >>> Brunstrun says:
>> >>>
>> >>> ""Ecstasy is a remarkably safe substance - it's far safer than
aspirin,"
>> >>> he said. "It's easy to find people on both sides of what is really
a
>> >>> very heated debate at the moment, I think.
>> >>>
>> >> He should lay of the whisky.
>> >
>> > Yes, alcohol kills 1,000s of people each year, whilst ecstasy kills
about
>> > the same number as peanuts.
>>
>> That is the only way to get the message across. We have to substitute
>> the facts and replace it with something they can understand. Peanuts
>> apples and oranges are all good examples.
>
>Peanuts kill.
So do condoms - or so the Pro-Life lobby would have us believe.
Those poor little spermatozoa either suffocate or drown when the condom
is flushed down the toilet.
And (since they're not biodegradable) shouldn't the Council be providing
collection bags so that condoms can be recycled?
--
Zillion
|
