On Apr 14, 5:02=A0am, Archy Feet <scho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> M_P wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 6:41 pm, Cla...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Claude) wrote:
> >> In article
<a494c9a1-4105-46a8-8640-7aa57f44f...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >> dohduh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(sobriquet) wrote:
>
> >>> This is demonization of THC, as if cannabis users are only
> >>> interested
> >>> in maximum THC content. To the degree that it is true, it's
> >>> primarily
> >>> a cause of prohibition,
> >> No I do not think that is right in fact if you checked back in this
new=
sgroup you
> >> can see comments by people wanting, using, appreciating stronger
forms =
of cannabis.
> >> It is NOT a product of regulation it is product of demand, more money
c=
an be made
> >> from it BECAUSE there is demand.
>
> > And as sobriquet said, the demand is fueled by prohibition. (Thanks to
> > prohibition, there is no "regulation" of cannabis.)
>
> But why should people want 'stronger and stronger Cannabis'?
So they can reach their desired level of stonedness with less smoke
inhalation, perhaps?
|
