M_P wrote:
> On Apr 14, 5:02 am, Archy Feet <scho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> M_P wrote:
>>> On Apr 8, 6:41 pm, Cla...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Claude) wrote:
>>>> In article
<a494c9a1-4105-46a8-8640-7aa57f44f...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>> dohduh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(sobriquet) wrote:
>>>>> This is demonization of THC, as if cannabis users are only
>>>>> interested
>>>>> in maximum THC content. To the degree that it is true, it's
>>>>> primarily
>>>>> a cause of prohibition,
>>>> No I do not think that is right in fact if you checked back in this
newsgroup you
>>>> can see comments by people wanting, using, appreciating stronger
forms of cannabis.
>>>> It is NOT a product of regulation it is product of demand, more money
can be made
>>>> from it BECAUSE there is demand.
>>> And as sobriquet said, the demand is fueled by prohibition. (Thanks to
>>> prohibition, there is no "regulation" of cannabis.)
>> But why should people want 'stronger and stronger Cannabis'?
>
> So they can reach their desired level of stonedness with less smoke
> inhalation, perhaps?
If smoking is the problem then the answer is to look at
other methods of ingesting THC.
|
