On Apr 14, 4:52=A0pm, Archy Feet <scho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> M_P wrote:
> > On Apr 14, 5:02 am, Archy Feet <scho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> M_P wrote:
> >>> On Apr 8, 6:41 pm, Cla...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Claude) wrote:
> >>>> In article
<a494c9a1-4105-46a8-8640-7aa57f44f...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >>>> dohduh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(sobriquet) wrote:
> >>>>> This is demonization of THC, as if cannabis users are only
> >>>>> interested
> >>>>> in maximum THC content. To the degree that it is true, it's
> >>>>> primarily
> >>>>> a cause of prohibition,
> >>>> No I do not think that is right in fact if you checked back in this
n=
ewsgroup you
> >>>> can see comments by people wanting, using, appreciating stronger
form=
s of cannabis.
> >>>> It is NOT a product of regulation it is product of demand, more
money=
can be made
> >>>> from it BECAUSE there is demand.
> >>> And as sobriquet said, the demand is fueled by prohibition. (Thanks
to=
> >>> prohibition, there is no "regulation" of cannabis.)
> >> But why should people want 'stronger and stronger Cannabis'?
>
> > So they can reach their desired level of stonedness with less smoke
> > inhalation, perhaps?
>
> If smoking is the problem then the answer is to look at
> other methods of ingesting THC.
*AN* answer is to look at other methods of ingesting THC. Another
answer is to get stronger cannabis.
|
