Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Drugs > Re: ACMD: Canna...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 10 Topic 11480 of 11601
Post > Topic >>

Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'

by M_P <m_p@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 16, 2008 at 07:29 AM

On Apr 15, 5:04=A0pm, Epson Salts <e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> M_P wrote:
> > On Apr 15, 1:23 pm, Squiggles <Squigg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> M_P wrote:
> >>> On Apr 14, 4:52 pm, Archy Feet <scho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>> M_P wrote:
> >>>>> On Apr 14, 5:02 am, Archy Feet <scho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>> M_P wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Apr 8, 6:41 pm, Cla...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Claude) wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In article
<a494c9a1-4105-46a8-8640-7aa57f44f...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >>>>>>>> dohduh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (sobriquet) wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> This is demonization of THC, as if cannabis users are only
> >>>>>>>>> interested
> >>>>>>>>> in maximum THC content. To the degree that it is true, it's
> >>>>>>>>> primarily
> >>>>>>>>> a cause of prohibition,
> >>>>>>>> No I do not think that is right in fact if you checked back in
th=
is newsgroup you
> >>>>>>>> can see comments by people wanting, using, appreciating
stronger =
forms of cannabis.
> >>>>>>>> It is NOT a product of regulation it is product of demand, more
m=
oney can be made
> >>>>>>>> from it BECAUSE there is demand.
> >>>>>>> And as sobriquet said, the demand is fueled by prohibition.
(Thank=
s to
> >>>>>>> prohibition, there is no "regulation" of cannabis.)
> >>>>>> But why should people want 'stronger and stronger Cannabis'?
> >>>>> So they can reach their desired level of stonedness with less
smoke
> >>>>> inhalation, perhaps?
> >>>> If smoking is the problem then the answer is to look at
> >>>> other methods of ingesting THC.
> >>> *AN* answer is to look at other methods of ingesting THC. Another
> >>> answer is to get stronger cannabis.
> >> I know which would do the least damage
>
> > Your sole concern may be damage; others may have different priorities.
>
> I can now see why it is so hard to get get Cannabis legalised with your
> attitude.

Damage minimization is an argument in favor of legalization, which
would make it easier for methods of ingestion to be investigated and
improved wrt damage, as well as for product strength to be reliably
known and for contaminants to be effectively minimized.
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
M_P <m_p@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-16 07:29:29 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
Epson Salts <es@[EMAIL  2008-04-16 20:45:18 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
Dr John Watson <drjohn  2008-04-17 08:22:15 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
Sally Beenwell <Beenwe  2008-04-17 12:02:42 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
Dr John Watson <drjohn  2008-04-17 12:33:07 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
bobbie sellers <bliss@  2008-04-17 09:22:19 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
pxhxz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-17 15:22:36 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
pxhxz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-17 15:18:37 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
Walter Bushell <proto@  2008-04-19 16:00:07 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
pxhxz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-17 15:15:44 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 6:39:04 CDT 2008.