M_P wrote:
> On Apr 15, 5:04 pm, Epson Salts <e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> M_P wrote:
>>> On Apr 15, 1:23 pm, Squiggles <Squigg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> M_P wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 14, 4:52 pm, Archy Feet <scho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> M_P wrote:
>>>>>>> On Apr 14, 5:02 am, Archy Feet <scho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>> M_P wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 8, 6:41 pm, Cla...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Claude) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article
<a494c9a1-4105-46a8-8640-7aa57f44f...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>>> dohduh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(sobriquet) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> This is demonization of THC, as if cannabis users are only
>>>>>>>>>>> interested
>>>>>>>>>>> in maximum THC content. To the degree that it is true, it's
>>>>>>>>>>> primarily
>>>>>>>>>>> a cause of prohibition,
>>>>>>>>>> No I do not think that is right in fact if you checked back in
this newsgroup you
>>>>>>>>>> can see comments by people wanting, using, appreciating
stronger forms of cannabis.
>>>>>>>>>> It is NOT a product of regulation it is product of demand, more
money can be made
>>>>>>>>>> from it BECAUSE there is demand.
>>>>>>>>> And as sobriquet said, the demand is fueled by prohibition.
(Thanks to
>>>>>>>>> prohibition, there is no "regulation" of cannabis.)
>>>>>>>> But why should people want 'stronger and stronger Cannabis'?
>>>>>>> So they can reach their desired level of stonedness with less
smoke
>>>>>>> inhalation, perhaps?
>>>>>> If smoking is the problem then the answer is to look at
>>>>>> other methods of ingesting THC.
>>>>> *AN* answer is to look at other methods of ingesting THC. Another
>>>>> answer is to get stronger cannabis.
>>>> I know which would do the least damage
>>> Your sole concern may be damage; others may have different priorities.
>> I can now see why it is so hard to get get Cannabis legalised with your
>> attitude.
>
> Damage minimization is an argument in favor of legalization, which
> would make it easier for methods of ingestion to be investigated and
> improved wrt damage, as well as for product strength to be reliably
> known and for contaminants to be effectively minimized.
IF the THC was absolutely pure it would still
give off carbon into the lungs when smoked.
|
