Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Drugs > Re: =?windows-1...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 3 Topic 11485 of 11860
Post > Topic >>

Re: =?windows-1252?Q?=91Prohibition=92_forces_police_to_?=

by George Grapman <sfgeorge@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 17, 2008 at 10:14 PM

M_P wrote:
> http://www.buffalonews.com/opinion/anothervoice/story/325226.html
> 
> By Peter Christ
> Updated: 04/17/08 6:38 AM
> 
> I commend the work of all the agencies involved in the March 26 drug
> bust in Erie and Niagara counties. I’m a retired police captain from
> the Town of Tonawanda, and I understand the difficulty of the job they
> have to do. But I do have one question: Why do we put our police
> officers in this position?
> 
> Look at the manpower used in this drug bust. The agencies used 100
> officers to track down 36 suspects. They also say that at 4 a.m. they
> used 300 officers, so that’s using 8.3 officers per arrest. There’s
> nothing wrong with that except that while those 300 officers are doing
> that, what other jobs aren’t being done? You’ve got 300 of them pulled
> off the streets for a day.
> 
> Also, these arrests were preceded by an expensive and lengthy
> investigation. What will be the result of all this hard work, money
> and time spent? Will we have fewer drugs in our community? No. Will it
> be harder for people to get drugs? No. Will it keep drugs out of the
> schools? No.
> 
> Nancy Cote, of Buffalo’s office of the Drug Enforcement
> Administration, was careful to re****t that, “There [were] no
> incidents. Nobody hurt. No dogs killed.” The whole idea I got from
> this article is that this drug bust was a kinder, gentler drug bust.
> 
> Here’s an idea for a kinder, gentler drug bust: How about simply not
> arresting people for doing drugs? I’m not talking about not arresting
> criminals. I’m talking about why we criminalize behavior that simply
> isn’t criminal.
> 
> If you’re an alcoholic in this society today, and you don’t drink and
> drive, and you don’t hurt other people or their property, what do we
> do to you? Nothing.
> 
> If you’re an alcoholic in this society today, what do we do for you?
> Most people respond nothing, but that’s not true. We have treatment on
> demand for the alcoholic. There’s no waiting list for Alcoholics
> Anonymous; anyone who wants to come in gets treatment.
> 
> Another thing we do for alcoholics is guarantee to them and the casual
> alcohol user, as much we’re able, a purity of product. And we provide
> them, as much as we can, with a safe place to purchase and use that
> drug.
> 
> But when we catch heroin addicts using heroin, we arrest them. We’ve
> cut back on treatment for drug addicts to build prisons, so we don’t
> have treatment on demand for the heroin addict. And as far as purity
> of product and a safe place to buy or use that drug, it’s ridiculous.
> We all know what we get in an underground marketplace.
> 
> We claim that we’re trying to help drug addicts. But if we really want
> to help drug addicts, let’s help them like we’re helping alcoholics.
> 
> The only way to have a kinder and gentler approach to dealing with our
> drug problems is to have a regulated and controlled marketplace. And
> the only way you can control and regulate the marketplace is to
> legalize the drugs. All of them.
> 
> © 2008 The Buffalo News.


  A few years ago on the day that ASA Hutchison, the DEA head, was 
speaking in San Francisco armed federal agents raided a local pot club.

  A member of the local police told me that the department had requested 
federal aid in pursuing crack dealers but was told it was a local problem.
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
=?windows-1252?Q?=91Prohibition=92_forces_police_to_waste_resour
M_P <m_p@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-17 14:48:41 
Re: =?windows-1252?Q?=91Prohibition=92_forces_police_to_?=
George Grapman <sfgeor  2008-04-17 22:14:47 
=?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_=91Prohibition=92_forces_police_to_waste_
M_P <m_p@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-18 13:05:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 6:06:40 CST 2008.