Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Drugs > Re: ACMD: Canna...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 10 Topic 11480 of 11860
Post > Topic >>

Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'

by pxhxz@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pete nospam Zakel) Apr 17, 2008 at 03:22 PM

In article <66pbtiF2lumuhU2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> bobbie sellers
<bliss@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

>	As long as prohibition is in effect smoking or va****ising wins the
>price war.  It takes about 10x as much cannabis by mouth(GI tract) as
>by inhalation to produce similar effects.  In addition cannabis
>by mouth might be effective medically but recreationally comes on
>unevenly and over a 8 to 12 hour period.  Cannabis patches might
>work and the idea deserves investigation but as long as it is
>illegal no one will put money into such research.

Note that most people who have compared Marinol or other ways of ingesting
cannabis by mouth for medical reasons prefer smoking or va****izing becuase

1) onset is quicker

2) less is needed

3) titration is easier

4) less debilitation

5) duration is less

>	Smoking or va****ising lets the active ingredients be absorbed in the
>most expeditious manner getting to the brain quickly.  That
>is why smoking cocaine and/or heroin is so quickly habit forming.

That's the same reason why smoking or va****ising is better for medical
reasons, just as when you are in the hospital they put the meds in your
intravenous tube, not in your mouth.  When you are in pain, you want the
drugs to act quickly.

>	However as has been shown in the past tobacco paralyses the bronchial
>villa which sweep the nasty stuff away while cannabis seems
>to stimulate them.

Just so.

-Pete Zakel
 (phz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)

"A day for firm decisions!!!!!  Or is it?"
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
M_P <m_p@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-16 07:29:29 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
Epson Salts <es@[EMAIL  2008-04-16 20:45:18 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
Dr John Watson <drjohn  2008-04-17 08:22:15 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
Sally Beenwell <Beenwe  2008-04-17 12:02:42 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
Dr John Watson <drjohn  2008-04-17 12:33:07 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
bobbie sellers <bliss@  2008-04-17 09:22:19 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
pxhxz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-17 15:22:36 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
pxhxz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-17 15:18:37 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
Walter Bushell <proto@  2008-04-19 16:00:07 
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
pxhxz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-17 15:15:44 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 6:22:24 CST 2008.