Re: =>Albert Hofmann, Inventor of LSD, Embarks on Final Trip <=

M_P <m_p@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>> >> I don't even need to specifically refute why you're wrong.  If
anyone
>> >> doesn't get it, they are ****ing retarded.
>> >[…]
>> >> If you don't
>> >> know that, you are wayyy beneath my level on drug knowledge, and you
>> >> can go educate yourself.
>>
>> >Coward.
>>
>> As if you've presented anything big to sup****t your points?  Please.
>
>Since I haven't presented anything "big" by your self-serving
>standards, you can present nothing at all? Cowardly and stupid.


I've presented my ideas.  You have failed to discuss them.  I'm not
interested in letting you further blame me for not giving you more
when you haven't given more.  It's your own failure to get into the
issues, because you are wrong, and you are avoiding admitting it.


>> The "..." part said what you believe is *not* the reason it was
>> banned.
>
>So you claim.


And rather than just admitting I'm right, you say stupid **** about
what I "claim".  What a lame **** you are!


>> >Nonsense. Anyone punished under that law is coerced.
>>
>> Most LSD busts are of dealers, not users.
>
>But not all -- ergo, there is coercion.


Of people stupid enough to get caught, sure, I guess.  It's pretty
irrelevant on the grand scale, though.


>> >And the government that passed these bans didn't think so?
>>
>> I certainly hope they weren't that naive.
>
>Your hopes mean squat. If they didn't think the laws would be
>effective, why did they bother? Just so they could be anal-retentively
>consistent?


That is certainly one aspect of it, yes.  Cannabis has always been the
real enemy, among non-hard drugs.

-- 
Joel Crump