Re: Drugs operation on city bound trains

Les Invalides wrote on 03/05/2008 :
> Anton Gÿsen <anton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> posted
>>Dr John Watson wrote:
>>
>>> A major operation to stop drug trafficking on East Anglia's rail
network
>>> saw police with sniffer dogs checking every passenger who arrived in
>>> Norfolk over two days.
>>
>>As long as they're not causing a problem WRT the rail journey then
where's 
>> the problem?
>
> For example:
>
>>A major operation to stop drug trafficking on East Anglia's rail network
saw 
>> police with sniffer dogs checking every passenger who arrived in
Norfolk 
>> over two days.
>
> I don't like being sniffed by dogs, especially big ones. I don't like
being 
> examined by uniformed men equipped with handcuffs and clubs, when I'm
going 
> about my ordinary everyday business in an ordinary everyday place where
no 
> offence has been complained of or committed. So that's two problems for
me.
>
> snip
>>
>>PC Andy Cook said: “We had uniformed and plain clothes officers
working with 
>> the dogs to detect anybody who had recently been in contact with
controlled 
>> substances. We also stopped anybody acting suspiciously or trying to
avoid 
>> the dogs.
>
> I don't like people stopping me when I try to avoid animals that I don't

> like. So that's another problem for me.
>
I can't stand animals out in public when they come sniffing around me.  
Tramps with dogs, Old Bill with dogs and my pet hate (no pun) dogs in 
pubs.

Guide dogs are good because they just get on with their job.  If the 
tramps kept their dogs under control they would not be a problem 
either.

-- 
Baldoni