Re: Raymond justifies the exploitation of Chinese workers.

On 4=D4=C220=C8=D5, =CF=C2=CE=E74=CA=B103=B7=D6, Jim Walsh
<jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:58:05 +0800, Raymond wrote
> (in article <7apl04t2nmqij310nuncnfe02uuj2pq...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
> > On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:36:37 +0800, Jim Walsh
> > <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> No. Raymond YOU called it exploitation (and I happen to agree).
>
> > From workers' point of view, it is exploitation.
>
> China has long since passed from feudalism to socialism, even according
to=

> your beloved CCP. There is NO Marxist or other justification for the
> exploitation of Chinese workers.

There is also no justification for the exploitation of the employers
too.  There are two sides to a coin...

>
> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----=3D=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure
Usenet=
 News=3D=3D----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe
#1 Newsgroup Service in the
World=
! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----=3D East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=
=3D----