Re: Raymond justifies the exploitation of Chinese workers.

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:30:31 +0800, fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote
(in article 
<e35c3e04-0f40-48cb-8779-4c0b7d88fe8b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):

> On 4ÔÂ20ÈÕ, ÏÂÎç4ʱ03·Ö, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:58:05 +0800, Raymond wrote
>> (in article <7apl04t2nmqij310nuncnfe02uuj2pq...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>> 
>>> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:36:37 +0800, Jim Walsh
>>> <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> No. Raymond YOU called it exploitation (and I happen to agree).
>> 
>>> From workers' point of view, it is exploitation.
>> 
>> China has long since passed from feudalism to socialism, even according
to
>> your beloved CCP. There is NO Marxist or other justification for the
>> exploitation of Chinese workers.
> 
> There is also no justification for the exploitation of the employers
> too.  There are two sides to a coin...

Excuse me, but I do not have a lot of sympathy for international
capitalists. 
If they experience a decrease in their excess profits, I will not shed a 
single tear.

-- 
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive 
crossposts.)


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----