Re: It is wrong to exploit workers.

On Apr 20, 11:24=A0pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:59:26 +0800, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote
> (in article
> <a1102a1f-b9bb-4ca5-a2f1-ebd1b1c4b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
> > On Apr 20, 5:18=A0pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>> =A0Even Raymond admits that.
> > His knowledge in econ 101 is as good as yours....
>
> > =A0He says it is good for social development.
>
> I take that you disagree with Raymond on that point. I take it that you
an=
d I
> agree that the Chinese worker should not be exploited (for any reason).

You should be around in the 1600 - 1970 where the British, French,
Dutch, Spanish, ****tugese,... exploited Africa and Asia for the good
of themselves.

>
> Right?
>
> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----=3D=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure
Usenet=
 News=3D=3D----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe
#1 Newsgroup Service in the
World=
! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----=3D East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=
=3D----