Re: It is wrong to exploit workers.

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:15:05 +0800, rst0wxyz wrote
(in article 
<71c9016c-3349-4287-a470-03caa328e401@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):

> On Apr 20, 11:24 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:59:26 +0800, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote
>> (in article
>> <a1102a1f-b9bb-4ca5-a2f1-ebd1b1c4b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>> 
>>> On Apr 20, 5:18 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>  Even Raymond admits that.
>>> His knowledge in econ 101 is as good as yours....
>> 
>>>  He says it is good for social development.
>> 
>> I take that you disagree with Raymond on that point. I take it that you
and 
>> I
>> agree that the Chinese worker should not be exploited (for any reason).
> 
> You should be around in the 1600 - 1970 where the British, French,
> Dutch, Spanish, ****tugese,... exploited Africa and Asia for the good
> of themselves.

Perhaps you raise these cases to argue that, whatever the British etc. did
to 
Africans and Asians in 1600-1970 the CCP can do to Chinese today.

As you undoubtedly know, I unreservedly condemn the exploitation to which
you 
refer and all the exploitation to which you have not referred.

And I oppose the exploitation of the Chinese workers by the CCP and their 
allies.

-- 
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive 
crossposts.)


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----