The Last Roundup
For decades the federal government has been developing a highly
classified plan that would override the Constitution in the event of a
terrorist attack. Is it also compiling a secret enemies list of
citizens who could face detention under martial law?
By Christopher Ketcham,
Radar Magazine, 28 April, 2008,
via Information Clearing House,
5 May, 2008
In the spring of 2007, a retired senior official in the U.S. Justice
Department sat before Congress and told a story so odd and ominous, it
could have sprung from the pages of a pulp political thriller. It was
about a principled bureaucrat struggling to protect his country from a
highly classified program with sinister implications. Rife with high
drama, it included a car chase through the streets of Wa****ngton,
D.C., and a tense meeting at the White House, where the president's
henchmen made the bureaucrat so nervous that he demanded a neutral
witness be present.
The bureaucrat was James Comey, John Ashcroft's second-in-command at
the Department of Justice during Bush's first term. Comey had been a
loyal political foot soldier of the Republican Party for many years.
Yet in his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, he
described how he had grown increasingly uneasy reviewing the Bush
administration's various domestic surveillance and spying programs.
Much of his testimony centered on an operation so clandestine he
wasn't allowed to name it or even describe what it did. He did say,
however, that he and Ashcroft had discussed the program in March 2004,
trying to decide whether it was legal under federal statutes. Shortly
before the certification deadline, Ashcroft fell ill with
pancreatitis, making Comey acting attorney general, and Comey opted
not to certify the program. When he communicated his decision to the
White House, Bush's men told him, in so many words, to take his
concerns and stuff them in an undisclosed location.
Comey refused to knuckle under, and the dispute came to a head on the
cold night of March 10, 2004, hours before the program's authorization
was to expire. At the time, Ashcroft was in intensive care at George
Wa****ngton Hospital following emergency surgery. Apparently, at the
behest of President Bush himself, the White House tried, in Comey's
words, "to take advantage of a very sick man," sending Chief of Staff
Andrew Card and then-White House counsel Alberto Gonzales on a mission
to Ashcroft's sickroom to persuade the heavily doped attorney general
to override his deputy. Apprised of their mission, Comey, accompanied
by a full security detail, jumped in his car, raced through the
streets of the capital, lights blazing, and "literally ran" up the
hospital stairs to beat them there.
Minutes later, Gonzales and Card arrived with an envelope filled with
the requisite forms. Ashcroft, even in his stu****, did not fall for
their heavy-handed ploy. "I'm not the attorney general," Ashcroft told
Bush's men. "There"=97he pointed weakly to Comey=97"is the attorney
general." Gonzales and Card were furious, departing without even
acknowledging Comey's presence in the room. The following day, the
classified domestic spying program that Comey found so disturbing went
forward at the demand of the White House=97"without a signature from the
Department of Justice attesting as to its legality," he testified.
What was the mysterious program that had so alarmed Comey? Political
blogs buzzed for weeks with speculation. Though Comey testified that
the program was subsequently readjusted to satisfy his concerns, one
can't help wondering whether the unspecified alteration would satisfy
constitutional experts, or even average citizens. Faced with push-back
from his bosses at the White House, did he simply relent and accept a
token concession? Two months after Comey's testimony to Congress, the
New York Times re****ted a tantalizing detail: The program that
prompted him "to threaten resignation involved computer searches
through massive electronic databases." The larger mystery remained
intact, however. "It is not known precisely why searching the
databases, or data mining, raised such a furious legal debate," the
article conceded.
Another clue came from a rather unexpected source: President Bush
himself. Addressing the nation from the Oval Office in 2005 after the
first disclosures of the NSA's warrantless electronic surveillance
became public, Bush insisted that the spying program in question was
reviewed "every 45 days" as part of planning to assess threats to "the
continuity of our government."
Few Americans=97professional journalists included=97know anything about
so-
called Continuity of Government (COG) programs, so it's no surprise
that the president's passing reference received almost no attention.
COG resides in a nebulous legal realm, encompassing national emergency
plans that would trigger the takeover of the country by extra-
constitutional forces=97and effectively suspend the republic. In short,
it's a road map for martial law.
While Comey, who left the Department of Justice in 2005, has
steadfastly refused to comment further on the matter, a number of
former government employees and intelligence sources with independent
knowledge of domestic surveillance operations claim the program that
caused the flap between Comey and the White House was related to a
database of Americans who might be considered potential threats in the
event of a national emergency. Sources familiar with the program say
that the government's data gathering has been overzealous and probably
conducted in violation of federal law and the protection from
unreasonable search and seizure guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment.
According to a senior government official who served with high-level
security clearances in five administrations, "There exists a database
of Americans, who, often for the slightest and most trivial reason,
are considered unfriendly, and who, in a time of panic, might be
incarcerated. The database can identify and locate perceived 'enemies
of the state' almost instantaneously." He and other sources tell Radar
that the database is sometimes referred to by the code name Main Core.
One knowledgeable source claims that 8 million Americans are now
listed in Main Core as potentially suspect. In the event of a national
emergency, these people could be subject to everything from heightened
surveillance and tracking to direct questioning and possibly even
detention.
Of course, federal law is somewhat vague as to what might constitute a
"national emergency." Executive orders issued over the last three
decades define it as a "natural disaster, military attack, [or]
technological or other emergency," while Department of Defense
documents include eventualities like "riots, acts of violence,
insurrections, unlawful obstructions or assemblages, [and] disorder
prejudicial to public law and order." According to one news re****t,
even "national opposition to U.S. military invasion abroad" could be a
trigger.
Let's imagine a harrowing scenario: coordinated bombings in several
American cities culminating in a major blast=97say, a suitcase nuke=97in
New York City. Thousands of civilians are dead. Commerce is paralyzed.
A state of emergency is declared by the president. Continuity of
Governance plans that were developed during the Cold War and have been
aggressively revised since 9/11 go into effect. Surviving government
officials are shuttled to protected underground complexes carved into
the hills of Maryland, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Power ****fts to a
"parallel government" that consists of scores of secretly preselected
officials. (As far back as the 1980s, Donald Rumsfeld, then CEO of a
pharmaceutical company, and Dick Cheney, then a congressman from
Wyoming, were slated to step into key positions during a declared
emergency.) The executive branch is the sole and absolute seat of
authority, with Congress and the judiciary relegated to advisory roles
at best. The country becomes, within a matter of hours, a police
state.
Interestingly, plans drawn up during the Reagan administration suggest
this parallel government would be ruling under authority given by law
to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, home of the same hapless
bunch that recently proved themselves unable to distribute water to
desperate hurricane victims. The agency's incompetence in tackling
natural disasters is less surprising when one considers that, since
its inception in the 1970s, much of its focus has been on planning for
the survival of the federal government in the wake of a decapitating
nuclear strike.
Under law, during a national emergency, FEMA and its parent
organization, the Department of Homeland Security, would be empowered
to seize private and public property, all forms of trans****t, and all
food supplies. The agency could dispatch military commanders to run
state and local governments, and it could order the arrest of citizens
without a warrant, holding them without trial for as long as the
acting government deems necessary. From the comfortable perspective of
peaceful times, such behavior by the government may seem farfetched.
But it was not so very long ago that FDR ordered 120,000 Japanese-
Americans=97everyone from infants to the elderly=97be held in detention
camps for the duration of World War II. This is widely regarded as a
shameful moment in U.S. history, a lesson learned. But a long trail of
federal documents indicates that the possibility of large-scale
detention has never quite been abandoned by federal authorities.
Around the time of the 1968 race riots, for instance, a paper drawn up
at the U.S. Army War College detailed plans for rounding up millions
of "militants" and "American negroes" who were to be held at "assembly
centers or relocation camps." In the late 1980s, the Austin American-
Statesman and other publications re****ted the existence of 10
detention camp sites on military facilities nationwide, where hundreds
of thousands of people could be held in the event of domestic
political upheaval. More such facilities were commissioned in 2006,
when Kellogg Brown & Root=97then a subsidiary of Halliburton=97was handed
a $385 million contract to establish "tem****ary detention and
processing capabilities" for the Department of Homeland Security. The
contract is short on details, stating only that the facilities would
be used for "an emergency influx of immigrants, or to sup****t the
rapid development of new programs." Just what those "new programs"
might be is not specified.
In the days after our hypothetical terror attack, events might play
out like this: With the population gripped by fear and anger,
authorities undertake unprecedented actions in the name of public
safety. Officials at the Department of Homeland Security begin
actively scrutinizing people who=97for a tremendously broad set of
reasons=97have been flagged in Main Core as potential domestic threats.
Some of these individuals might receive a letter or a phone call,
others a request to register with local authorities. Still others
might hear a knock on the door and find police or armed soldiers
outside. In some instances, the authorities might just ask a few
questions. Other suspects might be arrested and escorted to federal
holding facilities, where they could be detained without counsel until
the state of emergency is no longer in effect.
It is, of course, appropriate for any government to plan for the
worst. But when COG plans are shrouded in extreme secrecy, effectively
unregulated by Congress or the courts, and married to an overreaching
surveillance state=97as seems to be the case with Main Core=97even sober
observers must weigh whether the protections put in place by the
federal government are becoming more dangerous to America than any
outside threat.
Another well-informed source=97a former military operative regularly
briefed by members of the intelligence community=97says this particular
program has roots going back at least to the 1980s and was set up with
help from the Defense Intelligence Agency. He has been told that the
program utilizes software that makes predictive judgments of targets'
behavior and tracks their circle of associations with "social network
analysis" and artificial intelligence modeling tools.
"The more data you have on a particular target, the better [the
software] can predict what the target will do, where the target will
go, who it will turn to for help," he says. "Main Core is the table of
contents for all the illegal information that the U.S. government has
[compiled] on specific targets." An intelligence expert who has been
briefed by high-level contacts in the Department of Homeland Security
confirms that a database of this sort exists, but adds that "it is
less a mega-database than a way to search numerous other agency
databases at the same time."
A host of publicly disclosed programs, sources say, now supply data to
Main Core. Most notable are the NSA domestic surveillance programs,
initiated in the wake of 9/11, typically referred to in press re****ts
as "warrantless wiretapping." In March, a front-page article in the
Wall Street Journal shed further light onto the extraordinarily
invasive scope of the NSA efforts: According to the Journal, the
government can now electronically monitor "huge volumes of records of
domestic e-mails and Internet searches, as well as bank transfers,
credit card transactions, travel, and telephone records." Authorities
employ "sophisticated software programs" to sift through the data,
searching for "suspicious patterns." In effect, the program is a mass
catalog of the private lives of Americans. And it's notable that the
article hints at the possibility of programs like Main Core. "The
[NSA] effort also ties into data from an ad-hoc collection of so-
called black programs whose existence is undisclosed," the Journal
re****ted, quoting unnamed officials. "Many of the programs in various
agencies began years before the 9/11 attacks but have since been given
greater reach."
The following information seems to be fair game for collection without
a warrant: the e-mail addresses you send to and receive from, and the
subject lines of those messages; the phone numbers you dial, the
numbers that dial in to your line, and the durations of the calls; the
Internet sites you visit and the keywords in your Web searches; the
destinations of the airline tickets you buy; the amounts and locations
of your ATM withdrawals; and the goods and services you purchase on
credit cards. All of this information is archived on government
supercomputers and, according to sources, also fed into the Main Core
database.
Main Core also allegedly draws on four smaller databases that, in
turn, cull from federal, state, and local "intelligence" re****ts;
print and broadcast media; financial records; "commercial databases";
and unidentified "private sector entities." Additional information
comes from a database known as the Terrorist Identities Datamart
Environment, which generates watch lists from the Office of the
Director of National Intelligence for use by airlines, law
enforcement, and border posts. According to the Wa****ngton Post, the
Terrorist Identities list has quadrupled in size between 2003 and 2007
to include about 435,000 names. The FBI's Terrorist Screening Center
border crossing list, which listed 755,000 persons as of fall 2007,
grows by 200,000 names a year. A former NSA officer tells Radar that
the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, using
an electronic-funds transfer surveillance program, also contributes
data to Main Core, as does a Pentagon program that was created in 2002
to monitor anti-war protestors and environmental activists such as
Greenpeace.
If previous FEMA and FBI lists are any indication, the Main Core
database includes dissidents and activists of various stripes,
political and tax protestors, lawyers and professors, publishers and
journalists, gun owners, illegal aliens, foreign nationals, and a
great many other harmless, average people.
A veteran CIA intelligence analyst who maintains active high-level
clearances and serves as an advisor to the Department of Defense in
the field of emerging technology tells Radar that during the 2004
hospital room drama, James Comey expressed concern over how this
secret database was being used "to accumulate otherwise private data
on non-targeted U.S. citizens for use at a future time." Though not
specifically familiar with the name Main Core, he adds, "What was
being requested of Comey for legal approval was exactly what a Main
Core story would be." A source regularly briefed by people inside the
intelligence community adds: "Comey had discovered that President Bush
had authorized NSA to use a highly classified and compartmentalized
Continuity of Government database on Americans in computerized
searches of its domestic intercepts. [Comey] had concluded that the
use of that 'Main Core' database compromised the legality of the
overall NSA domestic surveillance project."
If Main Core does exist, says Philip Giraldi, a former CIA
counterterrorism officer and an outspoken critic of the agency, the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is its likely home. "If a master
list is being compiled, it would have to be in a place where there are
no legal issues"=97the CIA and FBI would be restricted by oversight and
accountability laws=97"so I suspect it is at DHS, which as far as I know
operates with no such restraints." Giraldi notes that DHS already
maintains a central list of suspected terrorists and has been freely
adding people who pose no reasonable threat to domestic security.
"It's clear that DHS has the mandate for controlling and owning master
lists. The process is not transparent, and the criteria for getting on
the list are not clear." Giraldi continues, "I am certain that the
content of such a master list [as Main Core] would not be carefully
vetted, and there would be many names on it for many reasons=97quite
likely, including the two of us."
Would Main Core in fact be legal? According to constitutional scholar
Bruce Fein, who served as associate deputy attorney general under
Ronald Reagan, the question of legality is murky: "In the event of a
national emergency, the executive branch simply assumes these powers"=97
the powers to collect domestic intelligence and draw up detention
lists, for example=97" if Congress doesn't explicitly prohibit it. It's
really up to Congress to put these things to rest, and Congress has
not done so." Fein adds that it is virtually impossible to contest the
legality of these kinds of data collection and spy programs in court
"when there are no criminal prosecutions and [there is] no notice to
persons on the president's 'enemies list.' That means if Congress
remains invertebrate, the law will be whatever the president says it is
=97even in secret. He will be the judge on his own powers and invariably
rule in his own favor."
The veteran CIA intelligence analyst notes that Comey's suggestion
that the offending elements of the program were dropped could be
misleading: "Bush [may have gone ahead and] signed it as a National
Intelligence Finding anyway."
But even if we never face a national emergency, the mere existence of
the database is a matter of concern. "The capacity for future use of
this information against the American people is so great as to be
virtually unfathomable," the senior government official says.
In any case, mass watch lists of domestic citizens may do nothing to
make us safer from terrorism. Jeff Jonas, chief scientist at IBM, a
world renowned expert in data mining, contends that such efforts won't
prevent terrorist conspiracies. "Because there is so little historical
terrorist event data," Jonas tells Radar, "there is not enough volume
to create precise predictions."
The overzealous compilation of a domestic watch list is not unique in
post-war American history. In 1950, the FBI, under the notoriously
paranoid J. Edgar Hoover, began to "accumulate the names, identities,
and activities" of suspect American citizens in a rapidly expanding
"security index," according to declassified documents. In a letter to
the Truman White House, Hoover stated that in the event of certain
emergency situations, suspect individuals would be held in detention
camps overseen by "the National Military Establishment." By 1960, a
congressional investigation later revealed, the FBI list of suspicious
persons included "professors, teachers, and educators; labor-union
organizers and leaders; writers, lecturers, newsmen, and others in the
mass-media field; lawyers, doctors, and scientists; other potentially
influential persons on a local or national level; [and] individuals
who could potentially furnish financial or material aid" to unnamed
"subversive elements." This same FBI "security index" was allegedly
maintained and updated into the 1980s, when it was re****tedly
transferred to the control of none other than FEMA (though the FBI
denied this at the time).
FEMA, however=97then known as the Federal Preparedness Agency=97already
had its own domestic surveillance system in place, according to a 1975
investigation by Senator John V. Tunney of California. Tunney, the son
of heavyweight boxing champion Gene Tunney and the inspiration for
Robert Redford's character in the film The Candidate, found that the
agency maintained electronic dossiers on at least 100,000 Americans,
which contained information gleaned from wideranging computerized
surveillance. The database was located in the agency's secret
underground city at Mount Weather, near the town of Bluemont,
Virginia. The senator's findings were confirmed in a 1976
investigation by the Progressive magazine, which found that the Mount
Weather computers "can obtain millions of pieces [of] information on
the personal lives of American citizens by tapping the data stored at
any of the 96 Federal Relocation Centers"=97a reference to other
classified facilities. According to the Progressive, Mount Weather's
databases were run "without any set of stated rules or regulations.
Its surveillance program remains secret even from the leaders of the
House and the Senate."
Ten years later, a new round of government martial law plans came to
light. A re****t in the Miami Herald contended that Reagan loyalist and
Iran-Contra conspirator Colonel Oliver North had spearheaded the
development of a "secret contingency plan,"=97code named REX 84=97which
called "for suspension of the Constitution, turning control of the
United States over to FEMA, [and the] appointment of military
commanders to run
state and local governments." The North plan also re****tedly called
for the detention of upwards of 400,000 illegal aliens and an
undisclosed number of American citizens in at least 10 military
facilities maintained as potential holding camps.
North's program was so sensitive in nature that when Texas Congressman
Jack Brooks attempted to question North about it during the 1987 Iran-
Contra hearings, he was rebuffed even by his fellow legislators. "I
read in Miami papers and several others that there had been a plan by
that same agency [FEMA] that would suspend the American Constitution,"
Brooks said. "I was deeply concerned about that and wondered if that
was the area in which he [North] had worked." Senator Daniel Inouye,
chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Iran, immediately cut off
his colleague, saying, "That question touches upon a highly sensitive
and classified area, so may I request that you not touch upon that,
sir." Though Brooks pushed for an answer, the line of questioning was
not allowed to proceed.
Wired magazine turned up additional damaging information, revealing in
1993 that North, operating from a secure White House site, allegedly
employed a software database program called PROMIS (ostensibly as part
of the REX 84 plan). PROMIS, which has a strange and controversial
history, was designed to track individuals=97prisoners, for example=97by
pulling together information from disparate databases into a single
record. According to Wired, "Using the computers in his command
center, North tracked dissidents and potential troublemakers within
the United States. Compared to PROMIS, Richard Nixon's enemies list or
Senator Joe McCarthy's blacklist looks downright crude." Sources have
suggested to Radar that government databases tracking Americans today,
including Main Core, could still have PROMIS based legacy code from
the days when North was running his programs.
In the wake of 9/11, domestic surveillance programs of all sorts
expanded dramatically. As one well-placed source in the intelligence
community puts it, "The gloves seemed to come off." What is not yet
clear is what sort of still-undisclosed programs may have been
authorized by the Bush White House. Marty Lederman, a high-level
official at the Department of Justice under Clinton, writing on a law
blog last year, wondered, "How extreme were the programs they
implemented [after 9/11]? How egregious was the lawbreaking?" Congress
has tried, and mostly failed, to find out.
In July 2007 and again last August, Rep. Peter DeFazio, a Democrat
from Oregon and a senior member of the House Homeland Security
Committee, sought access to the "classified annexes" of the Bush
administration's Continuity of Government program. DeFazio's interest
was prompted by Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20 (also
known as NSPD-51), issued in May 2007, which reserves for the
executive branch the sole authority to decide what constitutes a
national emergency and to determine when the emergency is over.
DeFazio found this unnerving.
But he and other leaders of the Homeland Security Committee, including
Chairman Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat, were denied a review
of the Continuity of Government classified annexes. To this day, their
calls for disclosure have been ignored by the White House. In a press
release issued last August, DeFazio went public with his concerns that
the NSPD-51 Continuity of Government plans are "extra-constitutional
or unconstitutional." Around the same time, he told the Oregonian,
"Maybe the people who think there's a conspiracy out there are
right."
Congress itself has recently widened the path for both extra-
constitutional detentions by the White House and the domestic use of
military force during a national emergency. The Military Commissions
Act of 2006 effectively suspended habeas corpus and freed up the
executive branch to designate any American citizen an "enemy
combatant" forfeiting all privileges accorded under the Bill of
Rights. The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act, also
passed in 2006, included a last-minute rider titled "Use of the Armed
Forces in Major Public Emergencies," which allowed the deployment of
U.S. military units not just to put down domestic insurrections=97as
permitted under posse comitatus and the Insurrection Act of 1807=97but
also to deal with a wide range of calamities, including "natural
disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency,
terrorist attack, or incident."
More troubling, in 2002, Congress authorized funding for the U.S.
Northern Command, or NORTHCOM, which, according to Wa****ngton Post
military intelligence
expert William Arkin, "allows for emergency military operations in the
United States without civilian supervision or control."
"We are at the edge of a cliff and we're about to fall off," says
constitutional lawyer and former Reagan administration official Bruce
Fein. "To a national emergency planner, everybody looks like a danger
to stability. There's no doubt that Congress would have the authority
to denounce all this=97for example, to refuse to appropriate money for
the preparation of a list of U.S. citizens to be detained in the event
of martial law. But Congress is the invertebrate branch. They say, 'We
have to be cautious.' The same old crap you associate with cowards.
None of this will change under a Democratic administration, unless you
have exceptional statesman****p and the courage to stand up and say,
'You know, democracies accept certain risks that tyrannies do not.' "
As of this writing, DeFazio, Thompson, and the other 433 members of
the House are debating the so-called Protect America Act, after a
similar bill passed in the Senate. Despite its name, the act offers no
protection for U.S. citizens; instead, it would immunize from
litigation U.S. telecom giants for colluding with the government in
the surveillance of Americans to feed the hungry maw of databases like
Main Core. The Protect America Act would legalize programs that appear
to be unconstitutional.
Meanwhile, the mystery of James Comey's testimony has disappeared in
the morass of election year coverage. None of the leading presidential
candidates have been asked the questions that are so profoundly
pertinent to the future of the country: As president, will you
continue aggressive domestic surveillance programs in the vein of the
Bush administration? Will you release the COG blueprints that
Representatives DeFazio and Thompson were not allowed to read? What
does it suggest about the state of the nation that the U.S. is now
ranked by worldwide civil liberties groups as an "endemic surveillance
society," alongside repressive regimes such as China and Russia? How
can a democracy thrive with a massive apparatus of spying technology
deployed against every act of political expression, private or public?
(Radar put these questions to spokespeople for the McCain, Obama, and
Clinton campaigns, but at press time had yet to receive any
responses.)
These days, it's rare to hear a voice like that of Senator Frank
Church, who in the 1970s led the explosive investigations into U.S.
domestic intelligence crimes that prompted the very reforms now being
eroded. "The technological capacity that the intelligence community
has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny,"
Church pointed out in 1975. "And there would be no way to fight back,
because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to
the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the
reach of the government to know."
ORIGINAL SOURCE:
http://www.radaronline.com/from-the-magazine/2008/04/mayjun=
e_2008_table_of_contents.php
Via: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19871.htm
(This item is posted under =91Fair Use=92 provisions).
- o O o -
=91Is War With Iran Imminent?=92- Justin Raimondo
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=3D12755
=91The Iraq War Morphs Into The Iranian War=92
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19839.htm
'Israel Preparing To Bomb Iran Nuclear Sites'
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=3D53558§ionid=3D351020104
'Joint Chiefs Chairman Says U.S. Preparing Military Options Against
Iran'
http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/25/AR2008042501=
480_pf.html
=91FEMA To Help Run 8-Day Disaster And Terror Drill Covering U.S. (And
Canada Command) In May=92
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=3D8679
See Also:
'Was April 20th The Original Date Of The Planned U.S. 'Air Strike' On
Iran?' http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/IRANPLAN.HTM
'Is A U.S./Israeli Air Strike On Iran Drawing Steadily Closer?' (News
Updates) http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/IRANWAR.HTM
- o O o =96
'Bush Was Prepared To Go Nuclear: Afghanistan Was To Have Been A NWO
Object Lesson!=92 http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/NUCLEAR.HTM.
=91The Plan For Three World Wars=92
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/3WARS.HTM
Elitist Blueprint For World Government Revealed
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2008/050108_elitist_blueprint...
'Astounding Quotes From The Political And Financial Elite On The
Planned New World Order' http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/TRAGEDY.HTM
Archived =91New World Order Intelligence Update=92 Articles on the =91New
World Order=92
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/sect22.htm
The Elite=92s Secretive Plan For A =91North American Union=92
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/NAU1.HTM
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/NAU2.HTM
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/NAU3.HTM
'The 1935 U.S. War Plan For The Invasion Of Canada'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/USINVASN.HTM
'Canadian Troops To Police U.S. Cities During Martial Law;
U.S. Troops To Seize Strategic James Bay Hydro Plant If Quebec
Separates?'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/CANTROOP.HTM
'The Grand Canal - The Elite's Continent-Reshaping, Climate-Altering
Water-Diversion Plan Will Turn Canadian Water Into 'Liquid Gold' From
James Bay To Mexico!'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/grand.htm
The Elite=92s =93Newstates=92 Constitution For The Coming =91United States
O=
f
North America=92
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/NEWSTATE.HTM
For related re****ts, see:
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/quebec.htm
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/drum.htm
________________________
Bankrupt U.S.A. Covets Iran=92s Oil=85.
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/MELTDWN1.HTM
'Sorting Through The Rubble In Post-Bubble America'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/MELTDOWN.HTM
'The Coming U.S. Economic and Financial Meltdown'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/MELTDWN2.HTM
'The U.S. Economic and Financial Meltdown Accelerates'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/MELTDWN3.HTM
'No End In Sight As U.S. Financial Crisis Deepens'
'Global Starvation - Coming Soon To Europe And North America, Too?'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/FOODLOSS.HTM
'The Coming Great Food Shortages In America' by Texe Marrs
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/TEXMARRS.HTM
=85And the likely response to an economic or financial crisis by =91El
Presidente=92 Bush?
George W. Bush: Constitution of the United States is just a "goddamned
piece of paper."
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_8534.shtml
'General Tommy Franks Says U.S. Constitution May Not Survive, Sees
Possible Military Form Of Government In The United States'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/FRANKS.HTM
'Concentration Camps in America? Martial Law Civilian Detention
Centers?'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/CONCAMP.HTM
'Astoni****ng 1987 =91Miami Herald=92 News Re****t Reveals Existence Of A
'Secret Government', Plus Plans To Suspend Constitution, Impose
Martial Law, And Activate Civilian Detention Centers'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/CONCAMP2.HTM
U.S. Congressman: American Concentration Camps "On The Books=94
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/CONCAMP3.HTM
'More Preparations For U.S. Martial Law'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/MOREMART.HTM
(Must reading!)
'FEMA: America's Secret Government-In-Waiting'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/fema.htm
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/GEO443.HTM
'War Is A Racket' by Major General Smedley Butler, USMC
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/BLACK-OP.HTM
'Chemtrails: Are They For Climate Control, Weather Modification,
'Black Ops' Or For Biological Warfare And Mass Vaccine Testing?'
- o O o -
Visit our invaluable archive of Articles on the New World Order
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/sect22.htm
You'll find a wide range of free online Classic History books (on
English history, American History, Canadian History, European History,
Napoleonic History, Russian History, German History, Greek and Roman
History), plus the books of Jane Austen, at
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.co=
m/freehist.htm
For free online Classic Travel Books,
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/freetrav.htm
For free online Classic Christian Books,
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/SERMONS
- o O o -
NUCLEAR TREASON AT THE TOP OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT?
These serious allegations, involving the alleged =91sale=92 of nuclear
secrets, reach right to the top of the U.S. government. The
prestigious London =91Sunday Times=92 first broke this blockbuster story
on 6th January, 2008 =96 it has been completely =91blacked out=92 by the
U.S. media and wire services!
For news headline and blogger article links on the recent sensational
=91U.S. Nuclear Treason And Betrayal=92 revelations of Sibel Edmonds, the
ex-FBI whistleblower who has been called =91The most-gagged woman in
America=92, go to http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/EDMONDS.HTM
=93If you made public all the information that the FBI have on this
case, you will see very high-level people going through criminal
trials=94 =96 Sibel Edmonds
|
