On Jun 22, 11:11=A0am, "Pepicek" <pepi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Whileyouslept" <whileyousl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:a2a01ba1-ff95-4490-a268-02eeb7ef328b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On Jun 22, 10:49 am, "Pepicek" <pepi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> > 'Fraid not, Your request wasn't polite enough.
>
> >> Oh, this will be the most polite, I'm sure - are all Canadians
asshole=
s
> >> or
> >> is it just my impression while reading your posts, guys? A simple
answ=
er,
> >> yes or no, is sufficient. Well, something tells me, Britons are not
fa=
r
> >> behind!
> >> After that, keep on pasting, Asshole #1! (numbers will be assigned in
> >> consecutive order of assholing)
> >> Pepa
>
> > Hmmm...your language would appear to indicate some '***ual identity'
> > issues.
>
> > Unless, of course, you *wanted^ to flaunt your ***ual preferences on
> > Usenet?
>
> Not at all, I'm trying to help you Asshole #1! Take another Viagra,
right
> now!
> Pepa- Hide quoted text -
Hmmm...you still have that fascination with men's behinds in your
postings, and now you're projecting your sublimated feelings of ***ual
inadequacy, too?
|
