Herb Martin wrote:
>> Based on black-letter law and not some ephemeral "inherent rights"
>> business,
>> all state and local laws regarding firearms are constitutional,
>> including absolute prohibition.
>
> I am talking about the simple fact that infringing ANY essential right
> without evidence is unconstitutional.
>
> No gun control law can pass strict strutiny nor anything approaching
> that standard.
>
>> That may change (slim chance, but possible) in as little as three
>> weeks.
>
> Whether SCOTUS rules this way or not, it remains unconstitutional,
> just as denying the right to an attorney was unconstitutional long
> before the Court got around to saying so.
Yeah, but your view of what's constitutional, or mine, doesn't count.
As for the attorney business, so far as I know, no case in the almost 200
years prior to the court's ruling was reversed due to the absence of
counsel.
|
