HeyBub wrote:
> Herb Martin wrote:
>>> Based on black-letter law and not some ephemeral "inherent rights"
>>> business,
>>> all state and local laws regarding firearms are constitutional,
>>> including absolute prohibition.
>> I am talking about the simple fact that infringing ANY essential right
>> without evidence is unconstitutional.
>>
>> No gun control law can pass strict strutiny nor anything approaching
>> that standard.
>>
>>> That may change (slim chance, but possible) in as little as three
>>> weeks.
>> Whether SCOTUS rules this way or not, it remains unconstitutional,
>> just as denying the right to an attorney was unconstitutional long
>> before the Court got around to saying so.
>
> Yeah, but your view of what's constitutional, or mine, doesn't count.
>
> As for the attorney business, so far as I know, no case in the almost
200
> years prior to the court's ruling was reversed due to the absence of
> counsel.
Utter bull****. Even the lack of effective counsel, or unprepared
counsel has caused the reversal of cases.
Do the google yourself.
--
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
George Santayana, 1863 - 1952
Cheers,
Bama Brian
Libertarian
|
