"z" <gzuckier@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:f6100265-6015-455e-9a44-a85294c8bb6a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> There ya go again, John. ( http://www.whoismaryrosh.com/)
> Unless you mean by that "Energy Independence", which would not be what
> anybody else means by that. Otherwise, the 2006 Democratic platform
> was:
Yes, let's look at their platform as poposed to the actual results we have
to live with before we give thesew nitwits another four years to ****
things
up:
> Honest leader****p and open government
House Ethics Committee hearings are starting now to get to the bottom of
potentially illegal Democrat rule changes *after* a vote had been taken
that
didn't go the "right way."
> Real security
And that's why they cancelled the FISA program, right? Now we have no
idea
what the muzzies are saying to each other. Some security when you let
Ahmed
the Terrorist sue the Telecom companies for letting the government listen
in
as he flaps jihad to his pals in Butt****istan.
> Energy independence
LOL! Let's trurn more corn into gasoline and see how many starving kids
in
Africa die. But, drill in ANWR? Off the coasts? Never! Far better to
watch
the Cubans move in offshore than risk smudging a one fukken seagull.
> Economic prosperity and educational excellence
We have a recession going on right now according to the Democrats who
promised to deliver us from such an event; the dollar is sinking lower,
oil
costs are at an all time high, and Johnny still can't read.
> A healthcare system which works for everyone
Where? Maybe for Congress.
> Retirement security.
C'mon! Your Democrat pals have been giving away social security money for
decades now; did you miss the latest about sending SS money to Mexico?
> Kudos to you Mr. Cole Firearms for bringing this fib to our attention;
> keep watching this guy.
You've been pretty well brainwashed, friend.
|
