Re: Gun-Grabbers at the Chicago Tribune

On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:05:09 -0400, "T Block" <tblock@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>
>It really bugs the gun-grabbers that the Supremes did not completely
>scratch out the Second Amendment last week, although they made a small
>first step in that direction. For instance, so steamed are they over
>at the Chicago Tribune they are calling for the Second Amendment to be
>repealed. As usual, they predicate their argument on three words —
>“well regulated Militia” — and claim beyond this you and I have no
>right to own firearms. “The amendment was intended to protect the
>authority of the states to organize militias. The inartful wording has
>left the amendment open to public debate for more than 200 years,” the
>Tribune claims.
>

The gun punks really overestimate themselves.  No one was looking to
abolish the 2A.  You're just so paranoid that if anyone raises any
question with you, they right away become a 'gun grabber' (that
overused term again from the Gun Thugs Manual).  You need to lighten
up and realize not everything revolves around you and your 'rights'.
But since you brought it up, I doubt you're part of any militia.  If
you are, then those in charge furnish the weapons.



K.H.