Re: Gun-Grabbers at the Chicago Tribune

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:17:32 -0500, grey_ghost471-newsgroups@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Gray Ghost) wrote:

>Kishter <fisster@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
>news:3l3j741255p6sj70pce6opvi5f18hvmoci@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 23:23:21 -0400, "RSweeney" <dockscience@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>
>>>"Kishter" <fisster@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> The gun punks really overestimate themselves.  No one was looking to
>>>> abolish the 2A. 
>>>
>>>Either ignorance or a lie.
>>>
>>>Gun banners seek to prevent the keeping and the bearing of arms.
>>>They have done so in numerous cities and continue to seek the same 
>>>nationally. 
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> You will now CITE which city has banned guns.  You need to get over
>> this irrational fear.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> K.H.
>> 
>
>New York City has banned semiautomatic rifles. After requiring
registration 
>and promising really, really earnestly that they wouldn't use the
registration 
>list to ban them. Anyone that had them had to sell them out of city and
prove 
>it, disable them and provwe it or turn them over to the police.
>
>California has banned a number of weapons which you may not own or be in 
>possesion of. Some cities require regaistration but then simply do not
make 
>registration available. 
>
>Nice try.
>
>Frank


The statement was  "Gun banners seek to prevent the keeping and the
bearing of arms.
They have done so in numerous cities and continue to seek the same 
nationally. "

It didn't say SOME guns.   Guns in total are not banned in NY or CA.  

Nice try.  Don't make more out of it than it is.



K.H.