Re: Heller denied permit

Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 said:

> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:21:55 -0400, "Brian Carey"
> <careyb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>>
>>"The Lone Weasel" <loneweasel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>news:Xns9AE4A5C1FE6FEloneweaselgml@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> We know from the Tenth Amendment that the People has at
>>> least one collective context, and we know from reading
>>> Elliot's Debates that the context of the militia
>>> amendment is collective.
>>
>> In Heller, SCOTUS ruled that the right to keep and bear
>> arms is an individual right independent of being associated
>> with a militia. 
> 
> Thanks for reminding us of the stupidity of Scalia and
> his buttboy Thomas.
> 
> Also for proof that "legislating from the bench" was in
> full force on that one.

I still haven't found a gunloon who can name any gun right he 
has now that he didn't have before, nor can I find one who 
understands that he has probably lost CCW in most states as 
well as gained a legal responsibility to license and register 
his guns.  All of them.  Also .50 sniper rifles and assault 
weapons as formerly defined by Chapter 44 are now dangerous 
and unusual, and subject to bans, in most states.

But then I live in Texas so none of that applies to me.  Our 
real gun rights are granted by the states, not by the Supreme 
Court.  Scalia's grant of an individual right under the Second 
Amendment has nothing to do.


-- 

Yours truly,

The Lone Weasel