Re: England's getting odder.

On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:28:38 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>
><ozarkheart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:nqnk845j3gl3u7jd6rjr5kgtdaqiq15bq6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:04:01 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>><ozarkheart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:7c0g849gk45e3fkfl3cpuht0ikql4lhj3e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:30:42 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>><ozarkheart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>news:r7o7849ortrs8c9mgiop1cpbont64viuh1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:43:11 GMT, "Blinky Bill"
<nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Bill Smith" <squandary@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:2ok584l2lgn0efctg5q35n7gk97jisfapj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>He claimed he could detect the effect many years ago - in the
early
>>>>>>>>>90s
>>>>>>>>>IIRC.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you want to argue with Lott, I suggest you take it up with
him.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm not disagreeing with him - you are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you assume
>>>>>>>>>>>> that a majority of Americans are legally armed, or even a
>>>>>>>>>>>> substantial
>>>>>>>>>>>> number in places where most of the crime occurs, you would be
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>According to Lott that doesn't matter - it's the increased risk
>>>>>>>>>>>that
>>>>>>>>>>>deters
>>>>>>>>>>>bad guys.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I can't speak for Lott, I don't agree with him. I don't think
>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>> are enough people carrying to make a measurable difference in
>>>>>>>>>> crime
>>>>>>>>>> overall.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Your opinion isn't fact or convincing evidence.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You seem to be convinced there are a large percentage of eligible
>>>>>>>> people carrying guns, where did you get this information?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What have I written that makes you believe that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Blinkyliar never answers a direct question.....
>>>>>
>>>>>That looks like a direct question to me, odiousfart - what do you
think
>>>>>stops it from being that?
>>>>
>>>> Jeez, being dishonest again; you are truly pathetic.
>>>
>>>Pathetic dishonesty is claiming that I am "convinced  there are a large
>>>percentage of eligible people carrying guns". I haven't written
anything
>>>like that
>>
>> You stupid idiot.
>
>You congenital ****wit.

LOL  A sure sign you have been spanked when you resort to vulgar
language.  


>
>>Of course you didn't.
>
>Then you agree the OP is a lying maggot like you for claiming that I did 
>write
>something like that.
>
>
>> You simply ask a question instead of answering.
>
>Of course, you terminal idiot. When the question contains a dishonest
claim
>about what I have said, how can I answer the question directly?

LOL You simple minded fool; try making a statement that you feel it is
dishonest instead of asking a question


> I know that
>inserting a lie into a question is standard practice for you, but honest
>people don't behave like that, only gunloons like you and the OP.

Actually, you are the habitual liar


>
>>  You steadfastly refuse to answer any direct
>> question, coward.
>
>So I only need to find one question that I have answered directly to
prove
>that you are a liar.

Nope


>
>"Question:  What would you like to have in order to protect yourself?
>
>Me: A system that prevented someone like that from getting firearms."
>
>So you're proven (yet again) to be a liar.

Nope, even a blind pid finds an acorn once in a while.



snip blinkyliar garbage