Re: England's getting odder.

<ozarkheart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:p3sm849bi7qpm77qiqopad05j8qm0ud9rk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:28:39 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>><ozarkheart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:uunk849eic6najoaj0mac6e76eg0u1hdi3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:05:35 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>><ozarkheart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:9g0g8498phg6bvr590hi0ubrrd2bs4997b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:44:35 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Bill Smith" <quandary@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:ml898494o0ih97s79tmsphi92f4sm8gsbe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Nearly 50% of US homes re****t owning guns - the ability to shoot
>>>>>>>>back
>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>more widespread than you think and not restricted to CCW.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you believe this is an even distribution throughout the
country?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You want me to do research for you?You will have to do that
yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As
>>>>>>> it happens the concentration is much higher in rural areas than
>>>>>>> cities. In areas such as rural Minnesota, where my in laws live,
>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>> very nearly 100%.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The US is quite urbanised. The small pro****tion of the population
that
>>>>>>lives
>>>>>>in rural areas just cannot account for the 200 million plus guns in
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>US.
>>>>>>Only about 15% live in communities of less than 1000 people, and a
>>>>>>tiny
>>>>>>fraction of that live in rural isolation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How many of these 1822 stabbing victims had guns, and/0r CCLs?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't know
>>>>>
>>>>> Then you are simply blowing smoke, idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> You make the claim that the 1822 had access to guns.
>>>>
>>>>All you can do is lie about what I have written - show me where I
wrote
>>>>1822
>>>>had access to guns.
>>>
>>> LOL As you say - do your own research.....
>>
>>It isn't my research - it is your claim so it is your research. But
nobody
>>is surprised that you are lying about that.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Your fevered imagination is not evidence - it often tell
>>>>you lies like "Virginia law banned guns on campus".  ROtFLMAO
>>>
>>> What lie? They are, stupid.
>>
>>Then cite the law Virginia law that banned guns on campus at the time of
>>the
>>massacre.
>
> LOL  You are pathetic.
>
> The following link takes you to the University policies, which the
> University has the authority to enforce from, guess wht dummycluck,
> the state of Virginaia.

So it is university policy, not Virginia law. And why do think that the
University has the authority to prohibit guns? This re****t says that the
University does not have the authority to regulate firearms.

http://www.roanoke.com/news/nrv/wb/xp-21770


"But Virginia code is silent on guns and public colleges. And two bills
seeking to give college governing boards the authority to regulate
firearms
on campus died in committee during this year's General Assembly session."

So there is no state authorisation for the University to regulate firearms
on campus. Of course it is no surprise that you try to lie about that.

>
> Ergo, Virginia law prohibits weapons on campus as out lined in the
> policy.

University policies are not Virginia law - and how does a University
policy
not authorised by the state become state law? You are a half-witted
buffoon.


>
> LOL  Have a battle of the brains with you is like fistfighting a one
> armed man........

Then your expertise at fist-fighting is as bad as your expertise at
English - you get spanked regularly ROTFLMAO

>http://www.studentprograms.vt.edu/judicial/do***ents/UPSL.pdf