Re: England's getting odder.

<ozarkheart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:l15p84lnn****0hiob6apmer5r2cfh5892j@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:17:01 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>><ozarkheart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:p3sm849bi7qpm77qiqopad05j8qm0ud9rk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:28:39 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>><ozarkheart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:uunk849eic6najoaj0mac6e76eg0u1hdi3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:05:35 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>><ozarkheart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:9g0g8498phg6bvr590hi0ubrrd2bs4997b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:44:35 GMT, "Blinky Bill"
<nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Bill Smith" <quandary@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:ml898494o0ih97s79tmsphi92f4sm8gsbe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Nearly 50% of US homes re****t owning guns - the ability to shoot
>>>>>>>>>>back
>>>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>>more widespread than you think and not restricted to CCW.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you believe this is an even distribution throughout the
>>>>>>>>> country?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You want me to do research for you?You will have to do that
>>>>>>>>yourself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As
>>>>>>>>> it happens the concentration is much higher in rural areas than
>>>>>>>>> cities. In areas such as rural Minnesota, where my in laws live,
>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>> very nearly 100%.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The US is quite urbanised. The small pro****tion of the population
>>>>>>>>that
>>>>>>>>lives
>>>>>>>>in rural areas just cannot account for the 200 million plus guns
in
>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>US.
>>>>>>>>Only about 15% live in communities of less than 1000 people, and a
>>>>>>>>tiny
>>>>>>>>fraction of that live in rural isolation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How many of these 1822 stabbing victims had guns, and/0r CCLs?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I don't know
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then you are simply blowing smoke, idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You make the claim that the 1822 had access to guns.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>All you can do is lie about what I have written - show me where I
>>>>>>wrote
>>>>>>1822
>>>>>>had access to guns.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL As you say - do your own research.....
>>>>
>>>>It isn't my research - it is your claim so it is your research. But
>>>>nobody
>>>>is surprised that you are lying about that.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Your fevered imagination is not evidence - it often tell
>>>>>>you lies like "Virginia law banned guns on campus".  ROtFLMAO
>>>>>
>>>>> What lie? They are, stupid.
>>>>
>>>>Then cite the law Virginia law that banned guns on campus at the time
of
>>>>the
>>>>massacre.
>>>
>>> LOL  You are pathetic.
>>>
>>> The following link takes you to the University policies, which the
>>> University has the authority to enforce from, guess wht dummycluck,
>>> the state of Virginaia.
>>
>>So it is university policy, not Virginia law.
>
> No, it is Universty policy that is backed by Virginia law;

Which Virginia law, odiousfart?

> therefore it is a Virginia law.

Then cite the Virginia legislation that makes University policy become
state
law, odiousfart. As  noted below, bills put before the Virginia
legislature
to allow the University to ban guns were rejected.

http://www.roanoke.com/news/nrv/wb/xp-21770


"And two bills seeking to give college governing boards the authority to
regulate firearms on campus died in committee during this year's General
Assembly session."

If the bills were rejected, how does the University policy have any
authority under state law, which is what you claim? Let me help you - you 
don't even have to beg for my help this time odiousfart. Here is a web
site 
with Virginia legislation. All you need to do is find the legislation that

makes VT policy become state law. ROTFLMAO

http://leg1.state.va.us/lis.htm