Re: England's getting odder.

<ozarkheart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:705p84tsko7sqnmb8upcm21fni020f1qic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:16:49 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>><ozarkheart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:5trm84pi4rh08aljdim5h5msurks3d3hau@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:28:38 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>><ozarkheart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:nqnk845j3gl3u7jd6rjr5kgtdaqiq15bq6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:04:01 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You seem to be convinced there are a large percentage of
>>>>>>>>>>> eligible
>>>>>>>>>>> people carrying guns, where did you get this information?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>What have I written that makes you believe that?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Blinkyliar never answers a direct question.....
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>That looks like a direct question to me, odiousfart - what do you
>>>>>>>>think
>>>>>>>>stops it from being that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jeez, being dishonest again; you are truly pathetic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Pathetic dishonesty is claiming that I am "convinced  there are a
>>>>>>large
>>>>>>percentage of eligible people carrying guns". I haven't written
>>>>>>anything
>>>>>>like that
>>>>>
>>>>> You stupid idiot.
>>
>>A sure sign you have been spanked when you resort to personal abuse.
>>
>>>>
>>>>You congenital ****wit.
>>>
>>> LOL  A sure sign you have been spanked when you resort to vulgar
>>> language.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Of course you didn't.
>>>>
>>>>Then you agree the OP is a lying maggot like you for claiming that I
did
>>>>write
>>>>something like that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You simply ask a question instead of answering.
>>>>
>>>>Of course, you terminal idiot. When the question contains a dishonest
>>>>claim
>>>>about what I have said, how can I answer the question directly?
>>>
>>> LOL You simple minded fool; try making a statement that you feel it is
>>> dishonest instead of asking a question
>>
>>That wouldn't be a direct answer  to the question, which is what you
>>demand.
>
> That's right. Honest direct answers are best;

Except, as you say above,  when the question inludes a lie. The above
question did, as do most questions from gunloons like you.

> and avoided by you.

Of course - when you or another gun loon bases the question on a lie then
I
have no option but to highlight your dishonesty.

>
>
>>So your suggestion is that the way to give a direct answer to the
question
>>is to not give a direct answer to the question, but say it is dishonest.
>>No
>>wonder other people describe your ranting scribblings as "difficult to
>>understand"  ROTFLMAO as you get spanked again.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I know that
>>>>inserting a lie into a question is standard practice for you, but
honest
>>>>people don't behave like that, only gunloons like you and the OP.
>>>
>>> Actually, you are the habitual liar
>>
>>A sure sign you have been spanked when you resort to personal abuse
>>ROTFLMAO
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>  You steadfastly refuse to answer any direct
>>>>> question, coward.
>>>>
>>>>So I only need to find one question that I have answered directly to
>>>>prove
>>>>that you are a liar.
>>>
>>> Nope
>>
>>steadfast = constant,unchanging
>>
>>So I am steadfast in the sense that the refusal to answer isn't
unchanging
>>or constant. Once again, your tenuous grasp of English lets you down and
>>you
>>get spanked again. ROTFLMAO
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Question:  What would you like to have in order to protect yourself?
>>>>
>>>>Me: A system that prevented someone like that from getting firearms."
>>>>
>>>>So you're proven (yet again) to be a liar.
>>>
>>> Nope, even a blind pid finds an acorn once in a while.
>>
>>So you think of yourself as  a blind pig, odiousfart - fairly accurate -
>>you
>>seem to share both behaviour and command of English with swine. ROTFLMAO
>>
>>
>>
>>