Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Guns > Re: => Sociopat...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 72 of 939 Topic 53792 of 58354
Post > Topic >>

Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says ****ntoism and Hinduism are "vile" and should be "exterminated" <= should violent psychopaths be allowed to possess firearms?

by "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 31, 2008 at 10:52 AM

Gray Ghost wrote:
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote
>> Chris Morton wrote:
>>> _ Prof. Jonez _ says...
>>>
>>>> Pathetic attempt to justify dropping NUCLEAR BOMBS on CIVILIAN
>>>> POPULATION CENTERS -- TWICE!
>>>
>>> So, what you're saying is that whole Rape of Nanking, Pearl Harbor,
>>> Bataan Death March, Unit 731, Rape of Manila thing didn't ...
>>
>> have ****-all to do with the amorality of the U$ deliberately
>> dropping NUCLEAR WEAPONS of Mass Destruction upon CIVILIAN population
>> centers, killing 100,000+ innocent men, women and children in the
>> process.
>>
>>
>
> I love this guy. I would truly like to give this moron a public forum
> to announce his views to the country. Even today he'd be lucky if he
> wasn't mobbed and killed for his insults.

How typical of a belligerent rightard like you to revert
to violence when faced with free speech that you can't refute.


> You are pointless. You hate America plain and simple. Anything the US
> has done, no matter how justified,

How justified was it to drop NUCLEAR WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION
upon CIVILIAN population centers, killing 100,000+ innocent men, women and
children in the process ? ..... twice.

> is simply wrong in your view.

So you better "mob and kill" me then, eh s***bag?


> The horrofic atrocities of others somehow doedn't count,

You seem to have become stuck in a cognitive dissonance,
which is causing you noticeable discomfort, and being
the knuckle-draggin' Neanderthal that you are, projecting
your own feelings of shame and embarrassment outward
in the form of violence against the messenger.

Typical for a lowlife pig-ignorant repug like yourself.


> apparently becuase they do not indict the US.

So tell us again, numbnuts, how do the incidental crimes of "others"
mitigate in any way the deliberate dropping of NUCLEAR
WEAPONS of Mass Destruction upon CIVILIAN population
centers, killing 100,000+ innocent men, women and children
in the process ? .... twice.

> Morally that puts you squarely on the side of the others.

"Other than you" ?  I would sincerely hope so.

> If none of the other atrocities listed
> matters than you are clearly excusing them.

You're lying again you stump-stupid amoral imbecile.


> That makes you an apologist for murderers since you
> can't even acknowledge the horrors of the them.

And yet another pathetic lie from the repugnant rightard.


> You are a vile and repulsive human being. If this is representative of
> Hi****ism,

Are you drunk again, eh asswipe?

> it s a vile and repulsive belief system that should be
> exterminated as Nazism and ****nto was.

Yet, Nazism and ****ntoism weren't exterminated.
Just how deluded are you, you amoral sociopath?
 




 939 Posts in Topic:
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cultural Supremacist <  2008-07-19 21:15:17 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Bill Bonde { ''Mr G  2008-07-20 02:20:02 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cultural Supremacist <  2008-07-19 21:33:06 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cultural Supremacist <  2008-07-19 21:37:51 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
nc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-19 21:28:48 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cultural Supremacist <  2008-07-20 10:24:17 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-19 22:37:43 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mr. Albritton <albritt  2008-07-19 21:43:32 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mahead the Mufti <mahe  2008-07-20 07:59:39 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RM V2.0" <B  2008-07-21 15:52:49 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-21 12:01:10 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mr. Albritton <albritt  2008-07-21 11:08:40 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-07-21 16:58:18 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mr. Albritton <albritt  2008-07-21 15:56:09 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RM V2.0" <B  2008-07-22 14:10:24 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mike <spamdump@[EMAIL   2008-07-21 16:22:40 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"** NewsByte **"  2008-07-21 12:02:42 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mike <spamdump@[EMAIL   2008-07-22 00:22:38 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-21 18:55:17 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mike <spamdump@[EMAIL   2008-07-22 15:10:29 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-22 09:51:10 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RM V2.0" <B  2008-07-22 14:10:05 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-22 09:54:16 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-22 11:40:01 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-22 10:47:04 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-22 14:58:54 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-22 18:01:02 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-22 20:55:09 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-22 20:34:04 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-07-30 14:10:56 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-30 15:19:05 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-07-31 06:18:38 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 10:30:09 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
44@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ha  2008-07-31 11:59:15 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 11:22:28 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 13:31:37 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 12:51:50 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 19:57:58 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-31 22:13:50 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 08:37:34 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-01 09:03:14 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 09:36:13 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-01 10:42:02 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 13:13:51 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 19:50:20 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-01 14:05:23 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 19:43:08 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 15:17:58 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-02 14:30:05 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 21:24:25 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-02 18:51:43 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-03 11:09:46 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-03 18:18:56 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-04 16:30:29 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-05 05:16:43 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-05 13:53:05 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-05 23:56:20 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"** NewsByte **"  2008-08-05 23:07:01 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-06 10:46:49 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 19:16:39 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-01 12:59:22 
Re: Bama Brian says dropping NUKES on U$ Civilians is OK! <= bec
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-02 15:00:57 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 17:28:49 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 11:33:33 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:37:31 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 20:13:09 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 14:27:50 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 20:41:13 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:41:23 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 14:33:27 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 11:06:43 
Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says Shintoism and Hinduism
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 10:52:50 
Prof Jonez refuses to answer moral questions. Continues insane r
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 12:19:13 
Re: Prof Jonez refuses to answer moral questions. Continues insa
"torresD" <t  2008-07-31 12:22:06 
Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says Shintoism and Hinduism
Kerry Ladd <Gus@[EMAIL  2008-07-31 13:51:33 
Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says Shintoism and Hinduism
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 19:10:55 
Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says Shintoism and Hinduism
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:13:00 
Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says Shintoism and Hinduism
Kerry Ladd <Gus@[EMAIL  2008-07-31 17:28:57 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:51:17 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 16:29:07 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"Felix D." <  2008-07-30 16:09:38 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"Billzz" <bi  2008-07-30 17:49:18 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-07-31 06:27:16 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 17:54:47 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= shou
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 14:14:51 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 16:31:54 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-31 21:59:32 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:13:42 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-22 21:27:55 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-22 20:52:04 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RSweeney" <  2008-07-22 23:46:33 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-22 22:22:29 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 03:12:29 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 09:16:54 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 12:37:42 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-23 19:00:12 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 14:26:23 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-23 17:48:14 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-24 00:38:39 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 00:50:04 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 20:26:51 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 00:59:56 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:34:24 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 20:33:12 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:01:15 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:50:41 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-24 06:14:56 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 09:55:09 
Re: Amoral Swine David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bomb
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-24 10:04:13 
Re: Amoral Swine David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bomb
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-24 15:25:08 
Re: Amoral Swine David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bomb
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 14:34:21 
Re: Amoral Swine David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bomb
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:40:44 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:39:39 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 21:17:25 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"RSweeney" <  2008-07-27 17:44:24 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-27 19:04:51 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"RSweeney" <  2008-08-02 01:49:46 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 20:23:43 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RSweeney" <  2008-07-23 19:48:42 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 21:21:53 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-08-06 08:20:21 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-08-14 09:24:20 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-08-14 11:57:29 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
"Morton Davis"   2008-08-15 03:48:51 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-08-15 06:57:57 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-15 07:21:44 
Re: David Hartung - Must be effective, he keeps getting attacked
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-08-14 09:25:36 
Re: David Hartung - Must be effective, he keeps getting attacked
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-08-14 11:54:22 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Mike Painter"   2008-07-22 21:25:37 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-22 22:26:38 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Mike Painter"   2008-07-22 22:35:50 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 09:13:22 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-23 00:41:00 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-22 22:48:39 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-23 01:03:36 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 09:15:13 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-23 16:13:09 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 15:07:45 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RSweeney" <  2008-07-23 21:04:48 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 00:00:17 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 03:11:03 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 15:09:42 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Mike Painter"   2008-07-23 14:27:07 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-23 16:24:11 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 17:39:12 
Re: David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs on Civilian
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-23 17:19:07 
Re: David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs on Civilian
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 19:33:10 
Re: David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs on Civilian
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 21:15:00 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 00:02:28 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 01:29:15 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:23:06 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:49:37 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 01:31:36 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:25:14 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:50:44 
Re: Amoral shitbag David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bo
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-23 23:59:42 
Re: Amoral shitbag David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bo
"Mike Painter"   2008-07-24 10:23:31 
Re: Amoral shitbag David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bo
jerry warner <jwarner@  2008-07-24 22:47:55 
Re: Amoral shitbag David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bo
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:33:09 
Re: David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs on Civilian
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 21:09:09 
Re: Gray Ghost says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs on Civilians!
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 00:04:34 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 21:08:37 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 17:00:19 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 21:07:07 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:28:19 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 09:59:33 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-08-01 10:14:01 
Re: => Max Muir says "I want to bomb the civilians" with Nuclear
Max Muir <orb_at_cts_d  2008-07-30 22:59:38 
Re: => Max Muir says "I want to bomb the civilians" with Nuclear
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 11:00:17 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-07-23 13:23:44 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-23 10:15:04 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 04:25:25 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-23 11:45:53 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 11:28:51 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
fburton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-23 09:44:03 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-23 11:47:09 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-23 10:00:22 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
fburton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-23 17:23:48 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-23 16:44:44 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 11:25:22 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 14:39:54 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-07-23 13:36:49 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-23 19:00:56 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-07-24 11:08:46 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-24 17:23:46 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 21:46:51 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-07-25 13:17:54 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-30 09:12:40 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-30 16:52:55 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-30 10:57:20 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-30 18:07:13 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-30 13:45:21 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-30 21:17:56 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Rodney Long <rdlong@[E  2008-07-30 15:47:28 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 10:53:29 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:16:18 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 19:59:15 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-03 12:56:49 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-08-14 23:28:21 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex W." <i  2008-07-23 12:43:43 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 11:31:25 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 19:21:53 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 18:42:40 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 20:35:34 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-23 23:57:00 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 01:21:49 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:31:24 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:44:38 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-08-01 10:18:34 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 19:16:25 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-24 00:43:57 
Re: DeadRat says it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Civili
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:36:44 
Re: DeadRat confirms it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Ci
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 11:46:51 
Re: DeadRat confirms it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Ci
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:46:36 
Re: DeadRat confirms it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Ci
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 22:18:43 
Re: DeadRat confirms it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Ci
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-25 07:37:10 
Re: DeadRat confirms it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Ci
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-25 11:08:26 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 22:24:52 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-25 07:39:58 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 06:07:30 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-25 11:09:34 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
John Wetton <Asia@[EMA  2008-07-25 13:54:58 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Mike Painter"   2008-07-25 12:33:34 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-25 13:55:32 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-25 16:50:45 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon C
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-25 18:02:07 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 18:14:57 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-25 18:05:06 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 19:14:22 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-25 19:53:47 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 20:59:12 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-07-25 19:20:31 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-25 19:53:07 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 20:55:10 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-07-25 20:55:50 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-26 06:12:13 
Re: DeadRatzo blows a gasket -- says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bom
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-26 01:18:21 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-26 13:53:55 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Alex W." <i  2008-07-25 23:59:17 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 19:19:49 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Alex W." <i  2008-07-26 12:47:41 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-26 07:36:30 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-25 08:27:30 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-26 20:57:14 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-27 05:07:06 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
hhyapster@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-07-27 20:33:00 
Re: Max Muir "I want to bomb the civilians" with Nuclear Weapons
Max Muir <orb_at_cts_d  2008-07-30 23:18:52 
Re: Pig-Ignorant Deluded Amerikkkans --- Felons say Supreme Cou
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-24 10:47:42 
Re: Pig-Ignorant Deluded Amerikkkans --- Felons say Supreme Cou
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 22:28:36 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Hiroshima Facts <hiros  2008-07-31 15:30:55 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Hiroshima Facts <hiros  2008-08-07 12:42:37 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-07 16:21:47 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-07 22:57:01 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
hhyapster@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-08-08 00:27:57 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-08 11:20:14 
Re: Max Muir says the 9.11 WTC attacks were justified -- Felons
hhyapster@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-07-25 02:41:18 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Max Muir <orb_at_cts_d  2008-07-24 09:31:54 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Max Muir <orb_at_cts_d  2008-07-24 10:05:18 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
"William Black"  2008-07-24 23:32:12 
Re: Max Muir says the 9.11 WTC attacks were justified -- Felons
Max Muir <orb_at_cts_d  2008-07-24 10:35:20 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
judith <judithsmith@[E  2008-07-30 15:42:51 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-30 13:01:13 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-07-31 17:20:01 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 03:56:41 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 09:23:56 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 15:50:30 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 13:19:46 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 19:53:25 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 23:06:03 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 05:35:25 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-02 14:54:09 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Paul Hyett <pah@[EMAIL  2008-07-24 08:26:44 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-24 10:52:23 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-24 21:46:23 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 16:11:43 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-25 01:28:43 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 21:35:11 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-24 09:23:23 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 21:33:08 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
Hiroshima Facts <hiros  2008-07-30 04:59:42 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CHILDREN is OK! <= shoul
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-07-31 17:11:09 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-07-31 17:14:15 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-07-31 18:03:58 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-07-31 19:54:46 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-07-31 20:03:58 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 10:39:17 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 10:57:44 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 10:39:59 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 10:57:21 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Kerry Ladd <Gus@[EMAIL  2008-08-01 15:10:31 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 20:48:21 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 20:49:16 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 05:40:09 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-01 08:49:40 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 17:14:43 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 17:19:31 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 17:28:47 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 17:30:32 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 17:31:21 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-01 19:57:39 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 19:29:39 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 02:37:26 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 19:54:41 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 21:01:45 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 00:50:15 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 19:30:31 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 19:32:07 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 19:55:51 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 19:58:33 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 03:42:19 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 21:05:47 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 21:06:44 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-02 05:07:01 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-02 09:31:32 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-02 14:45:08 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-02 16:16:00 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-02 19:09:15 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-02 19:29:19 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-03 06:46:00 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-03 04:38:41 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-03 03:37:16 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-02 12:13:18 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 20:55:57 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 21:04:45 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 21:06:20 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-01 22:00:00 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 04:32:40 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 22:31:35 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 05:13:52 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-02 11:40:24 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-02 09:58:39 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-02 14:40:41 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 20:52:06 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-03 11:40:49 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 20:06:46 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-03 00:03:13 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-03 12:39:50 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-03 11:46:56 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-04 13:47:27 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-04 19:33:33 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-03 11:07:48 </