Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Guns > Re: Gray Ghost ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 67 of 939 Topic 53792 of 58356
Post > Topic >>

Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -- Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barred from owning guns

by "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 31, 2008 at 02:27 PM

Deadrat wrote:
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _"  wrote in
>>>> Deadrat wrote:
>>>>> Chris Morton <cmorton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>>> _ Prof. Jonez _
>>>>>>> Chris Morton wrote:
>>>>>>>> _ Prof. Jonez _ says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pathetic attempt to justify dropping NUCLEAR BOMBS on CIVILIAN
>>>>>>>>> POPULATION CENTERS -- TWICE!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, what you're saying is that whole Rape of Nanking, Pearl
>>>>>>>> Harbor, Bataan Death March, Unit 731, Rape of Manila thing
>>>>>>>> didn't ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> have ****-all to do with the amorality of the U$ deliberately
>>>>>>> dropping NUCLEAR WEAPONS of Mass Destruction upon CIVILIAN
>>>>>>> population
>>>>>>> centers, killing 100,000+ innocent men, women and children in
>>>>>>> the process.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It has EVERYTHING to do with it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Japan engaged in a brutal and ultimately foolish war of genocide
>>>>>> and aggression against its neighbors, during which it didn't show
>>>>>> one iota of mercy to ANYONE, not even its own troops and
>>>>>> civilians.
>>>>>
>>>>> So your argument is that we should descend to their level of
>>>>> brutality?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nobody was going to sacrifice the lives of the victims to protect
>>>>>> the victimizers.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that's the argument:  we did sacrifice the lives of the
>>>>> blamesless to punish to the victimizers.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Japan made a series of choices.
>>>>>
>>>>> Japan is a country.  Countries do not make decisions.  People do.
>>>>>
>>>>>> At the least they should man up and own the consequences of those
>>>>>> choices.
>>>>>
>>>>> How about the women killed by the blasts?  Should they have
>>>>> "manned up"?
>>>>
>>>> Aren't you proud to have fellow vermin like him as your voting
>>>> countrymen. eh ratzo ?
>>>
>>> I have a long list of countrymen I'm proud of.  I just recite a few
>>> names when confronted with people like this.  I also remember that
>>> these guys may be taking a few pages from your text on posting
>>> habits.
>>
>> So *I* made them drop NUCLEAR WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION
>> upon 100,000+ innocent CIVILIANS, women and children ...?
>>
>> Whooooooooooooooooooooosh!
>
> Good heavens!  How did you get there?  I'm not talking about people in
> charge in 1945; I'm talking about the clowns you're provoking in this
> thread.  I'm saying they may be provocateurs like yourself.

Is that your final answer?
 




 939 Posts in Topic:
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cultural Supremacist <  2008-07-19 21:15:17 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Bill Bonde { ''Mr G  2008-07-20 02:20:02 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cultural Supremacist <  2008-07-19 21:33:06 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cultural Supremacist <  2008-07-19 21:37:51 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
nc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-19 21:28:48 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cultural Supremacist <  2008-07-20 10:24:17 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-19 22:37:43 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mr. Albritton <albritt  2008-07-19 21:43:32 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mahead the Mufti <mahe  2008-07-20 07:59:39 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RM V2.0" <B  2008-07-21 15:52:49 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-21 12:01:10 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mr. Albritton <albritt  2008-07-21 11:08:40 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-07-21 16:58:18 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mr. Albritton <albritt  2008-07-21 15:56:09 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RM V2.0" <B  2008-07-22 14:10:24 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mike <spamdump@[EMAIL   2008-07-21 16:22:40 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"** NewsByte **"  2008-07-21 12:02:42 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mike <spamdump@[EMAIL   2008-07-22 00:22:38 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-21 18:55:17 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mike <spamdump@[EMAIL   2008-07-22 15:10:29 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-22 09:51:10 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RM V2.0" <B  2008-07-22 14:10:05 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-22 09:54:16 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-22 11:40:01 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-22 10:47:04 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-22 14:58:54 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-22 18:01:02 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-22 20:55:09 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-22 20:34:04 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-07-30 14:10:56 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-30 15:19:05 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-07-31 06:18:38 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 10:30:09 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
44@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ha  2008-07-31 11:59:15 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 11:22:28 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 13:31:37 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 12:51:50 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 19:57:58 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-31 22:13:50 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 08:37:34 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-01 09:03:14 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 09:36:13 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-01 10:42:02 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 13:13:51 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 19:50:20 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-01 14:05:23 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 19:43:08 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 15:17:58 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-02 14:30:05 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 21:24:25 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-02 18:51:43 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-03 11:09:46 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-03 18:18:56 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-04 16:30:29 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-05 05:16:43 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-05 13:53:05 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-05 23:56:20 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"** NewsByte **"  2008-08-05 23:07:01 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-06 10:46:49 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 19:16:39 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-01 12:59:22 
Re: Bama Brian says dropping NUKES on U$ Civilians is OK! <= bec
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-02 15:00:57 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 17:28:49 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 11:33:33 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:37:31 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 20:13:09 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 14:27:50 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 20:41:13 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:41:23 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 14:33:27 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 11:06:43 
Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says Shintoism and Hinduism
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 10:52:50 
Prof Jonez refuses to answer moral questions. Continues insane r
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 12:19:13 
Re: Prof Jonez refuses to answer moral questions. Continues insa
"torresD" <t  2008-07-31 12:22:06 
Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says Shintoism and Hinduism
Kerry Ladd <Gus@[EMAIL  2008-07-31 13:51:33 
Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says Shintoism and Hinduism
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 19:10:55 
Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says Shintoism and Hinduism
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:13:00 
Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says Shintoism and Hinduism
Kerry Ladd <Gus@[EMAIL  2008-07-31 17:28:57 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:51:17 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 16:29:07 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"Felix D." <  2008-07-30 16:09:38 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"Billzz" <bi  2008-07-30 17:49:18 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-07-31 06:27:16 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 17:54:47 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= shou
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 14:14:51 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 16:31:54 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-31 21:59:32 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:13:42 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-22 21:27:55 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-22 20:52:04 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RSweeney" <  2008-07-22 23:46:33 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-22 22:22:29 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 03:12:29 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 09:16:54 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 12:37:42 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-23 19:00:12 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 14:26:23 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-23 17:48:14 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-24 00:38:39 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 00:50:04 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 20:26:51 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 00:59:56 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:34:24 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 20:33:12 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:01:15 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:50:41 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-24 06:14:56 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 09:55:09 
Re: Amoral Swine David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bomb
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-24 10:04:13 
Re: Amoral Swine David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bomb
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-24 15:25:08 
Re: Amoral Swine David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bomb
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 14:34:21 
Re: Amoral Swine David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bomb
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:40:44 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:39:39 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 21:17:25 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"RSweeney" <  2008-07-27 17:44:24 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-27 19:04:51 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"RSweeney" <  2008-08-02 01:49:46 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 20:23:43 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RSweeney" <  2008-07-23 19:48:42 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 21:21:53 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-08-06 08:20:21 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-08-14 09:24:20 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-08-14 11:57:29 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
"Morton Davis"   2008-08-15 03:48:51 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-08-15 06:57:57 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-15 07:21:44 
Re: David Hartung - Must be effective, he keeps getting attacked
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-08-14 09:25:36 
Re: David Hartung - Must be effective, he keeps getting attacked
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-08-14 11:54:22 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Mike Painter"   2008-07-22 21:25:37 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-22 22:26:38 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Mike Painter"   2008-07-22 22:35:50 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 09:13:22 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-23 00:41:00 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-22 22:48:39 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-23 01:03:36 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 09:15:13 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-23 16:13:09 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 15:07:45 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RSweeney" <  2008-07-23 21:04:48 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 00:00:17 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 03:11:03 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 15:09:42 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Mike Painter"   2008-07-23 14:27:07 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-23 16:24:11 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 17:39:12 
Re: David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs on Civilian
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-23 17:19:07 
Re: David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs on Civilian
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 19:33:10 
Re: David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs on Civilian
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 21:15:00 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 00:02:28 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 01:29:15 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:23:06 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:49:37 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 01:31:36 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:25:14 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:50:44 
Re: Amoral shitbag David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bo
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-23 23:59:42 
Re: Amoral shitbag David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bo
"Mike Painter"   2008-07-24 10:23:31 
Re: Amoral shitbag David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bo
jerry warner <jwarner@  2008-07-24 22:47:55 
Re: Amoral shitbag David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bo
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:33:09 
Re: David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs on Civilian
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 21:09:09 
Re: Gray Ghost says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs on Civilians!
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 00:04:34 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 21:08:37 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 17:00:19 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 21:07:07 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:28:19 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 09:59:33 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-08-01 10:14:01 
Re: => Max Muir says "I want to bomb the civilians" with Nuclear
Max Muir <orb_at_cts_d  2008-07-30 22:59:38 
Re: => Max Muir says "I want to bomb the civilians" with Nuclear
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 11:00:17 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-07-23 13:23:44 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-23 10:15:04 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 04:25:25 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-23 11:45:53 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 11:28:51 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
fburton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-23 09:44:03 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-23 11:47:09 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-23 10:00:22 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
fburton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-23 17:23:48 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-23 16:44:44 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 11:25:22 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 14:39:54 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-07-23 13:36:49 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-23 19:00:56 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-07-24 11:08:46 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-24 17:23:46 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 21:46:51 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-07-25 13:17:54 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-30 09:12:40 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-30 16:52:55 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-30 10:57:20 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-30 18:07:13 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-30 13:45:21 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-30 21:17:56 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Rodney Long <rdlong@[E  2008-07-30 15:47:28 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 10:53:29 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:16:18 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 19:59:15 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-03 12:56:49 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-08-14 23:28:21 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex W." <i  2008-07-23 12:43:43 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 11:31:25 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 19:21:53 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 18:42:40 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 20:35:34 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-23 23:57:00 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 01:21:49 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:31:24 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:44:38 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-08-01 10:18:34 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 19:16:25 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-24 00:43:57 
Re: DeadRat says it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Civili
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:36:44 
Re: DeadRat confirms it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Ci
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 11:46:51 
Re: DeadRat confirms it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Ci
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:46:36 
Re: DeadRat confirms it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Ci
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 22:18:43 
Re: DeadRat confirms it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Ci
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-25 07:37:10 
Re: DeadRat confirms it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Ci
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-25 11:08:26 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 22:24:52 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-25 07:39:58 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 06:07:30 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-25 11:09:34 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
John Wetton <Asia@[EMA  2008-07-25 13:54:58 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Mike Painter"   2008-07-25 12:33:34 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-25 13:55:32 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-25 16:50:45 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon C
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-25 18:02:07 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 18:14:57 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-25 18:05:06 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 19:14:22 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-25 19:53:47 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 20:59:12 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-07-25 19:20:31 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-25 19:53:07 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 20:55:10 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-07-25 20:55:50 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-26 06:12:13 
Re: DeadRatzo blows a gasket -- says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bom
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-26 01:18:21 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-26 13:53:55 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Alex W." <i  2008-07-25 23:59:17 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 19:19:49 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Alex W." <i  2008-07-26 12:47:41 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-26 07:36:30 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-25 08:27:30 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-26 20:57:14 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-27 05:07:06 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
hhyapster@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-07-27 20:33:00 
Re: Max Muir "I want to bomb the civilians" with Nuclear Weapons
Max Muir <orb_at_cts_d  2008-07-30 23:18:52 
Re: Pig-Ignorant Deluded Amerikkkans --- Felons say Supreme Cou
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-24 10:47:42 
Re: Pig-Ignorant Deluded Amerikkkans --- Felons say Supreme Cou
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 22:28:36 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Hiroshima Facts <hiros  2008-07-31 15:30:55 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Hiroshima Facts <hiros  2008-08-07 12:42:37 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-07 16:21:47 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-07 22:57:01 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
hhyapster@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-08-08 00:27:57 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-08 11:20:14 
Re: Max Muir says the 9.11 WTC attacks were justified -- Felons
hhyapster@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-07-25 02:41:18 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Max Muir <orb_at_cts_d  2008-07-24 09:31:54 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Max Muir <orb_at_cts_d  2008-07-24 10:05:18 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
"William Black"  2008-07-24 23:32:12 
Re: Max Muir says the 9.11 WTC attacks were justified -- Felons
Max Muir <orb_at_cts_d  2008-07-24 10:35:20 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
judith <judithsmith@[E  2008-07-30 15:42:51 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-30 13:01:13 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-07-31 17:20:01 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 03:56:41 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 09:23:56 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 15:50:30 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 13:19:46 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 19:53:25 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 23:06:03 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 05:35:25 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-02 14:54:09 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Paul Hyett <pah@[EMAIL  2008-07-24 08:26:44 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-24 10:52:23 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-24 21:46:23 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 16:11:43 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-25 01:28:43 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 21:35:11 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-24 09:23:23 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 21:33:08 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
Hiroshima Facts <hiros  2008-07-30 04:59:42 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CHILDREN is OK! <= shoul
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-07-31 17:11:09 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-07-31 17:14:15 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-07-31 18:03:58 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-07-31 19:54:46 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-07-31 20:03:58 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 10:39:17 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 10:57:44 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 10:39:59 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 10:57:21 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Kerry Ladd <Gus@[EMAIL  2008-08-01 15:10:31 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 20:48:21 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 20:49:16 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 05:40:09 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-01 08:49:40 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 17:14:43 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 17:19:31 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 17:28:47 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 17:30:32 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 17:31:21 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-01 19:57:39 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 19:29:39 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 02:37:26 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 19:54:41 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 21:01:45 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 00:50:15 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 19:30:31 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 19:32:07 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 19:55:51 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 19:58:33 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 03:42:19 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 21:05:47 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 21:06:44 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-02 05:07:01 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-02 09:31:32 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-02 14:45:08 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-02 16:16:00 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-02 19:09:15 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-02 19:29:19 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-03 06:46:00 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-03 04:38:41 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-03 03:37:16 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-02 12:13:18 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 20:55:57 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 21:04:45 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 21:06:20 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-01 22:00:00 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 04:32:40 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 22:31:35 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 05:13:52 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-02 11:40:24 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-02 09:58:39 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-02 14:40:41 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 20:52:06 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-03 11:40:49 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 20:06:46 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-03 00:03:13 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-03 12:39:50 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-03 11:46:56 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-04 13:47:27 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca