Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Guns > Re: => Gray Gho...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 46 of 939 Topic 53792 of 58356
Post > Topic >>

Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of ****

by Bama Brian <bamaNOTbrian@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 1, 2008 at 02:05 PM

Free Lunch wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:37:34 -0500, grey_ghost471-newsgroups@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Gray Ghost) wrote in alt.atheism:
> 
>> "Reality_Check©" <Reality@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:6ffgrvFb3rt2U1
>> @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> "Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>> Gray Ghost wrote:
>>>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>>>>> Harry Callahan wrote:
>>>>>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>>>>>>> Chris Morton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> _ Prof. Jonez _ says...
>>>>>>>>>>> Chris Morton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> _ Prof. Jonez _ says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pathetic attempt to justify dropping NUCLEAR BOMBS on
CIVILIAN
>>>>>>>>>>>>> POPULATION CENTERS -- TWICE!
>>>>>>>>>>>> So, what you're saying is that whole Rape of Nanking, Pearl
>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbor, Bataan Death March, Unit 731, Rape of Manila thing
didn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> ... 
>>>>>>>>>>> have ****-all to do with the amorality of the U$ deliberately
>>>>>>>>>>> dropping NUCLEAR WEAPONS of Mass Destruction upon CIVILIAN
>>>>>>>>>>> population centers, killing 100,000+ innocent men, women and
>>>>>>>>>>> children in the process. 
>>>>>>>>>> It has EVERYTHING to do with it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Japan engaged in a brutal and ultimately foolish war of
genocide
>>>>>>>>>> and aggression against its neighbors, during which it didn't
show
>>>>>>>>>> one iota of mercy to ANYONE, not even its own troops and
civilians.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nobody was going to sacrifice the lives of the victims to
protect
>>>>>>>>>> the victimizers.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Japan made a series of choices.  At the least they should man
up
>>>>>>>>>> and own the consequences of those choices.
>>>>>>>>> So it's OK in your rabid Repugnikkkan opinion to commit War
Crimes
>>>>>>>>> and Crimes Against Humanity against CIVILIANS, as long as they
>>>>>>>>> deserved it in your infinite wisdom, eh s***bag?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What did the men, women and children of Hanking do to deserve
what
>>>>>>>> they got? 
>>>>>>> How does that justify dropping NUCLEAR WEAPONS of Mass Destruction
>>>>>>> upon 100,000+ CIVILIANS. women and children,  in Hiro****ma and
>>>>>>> Nagasaki ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Assuming Hiro****ma was wrong,
>>>>> And the thousands of innocent civilians, women and children in
Nagasaki?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why does a depraved amoral sack of **** like you attempt to justify
>>>>> dropping NUCLEAR WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION upon a CIVILIAN
population
>>>>> centers, killing 100,000+ innocent men, women and children in the
>>>>> process? 
>>>>>
>>>> Alright then, let's leave Hiro****ma and Nagasaki out of it
altogether.
>>> How can one leave Hiro****ma and Nagasaki out of the discussion
>>> about the immorality of dropping NUCLEAR WEAPONS of Mass
>>> Destruction upon CIVILIAN population centers, slaughtering 100,000+
>>> innocent men, women and children in the process ?
>>>
>>> Are you that daft?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> So there were no other "immoral" acts committed during WWII by anyone
exceot 
>> the US?
>>
>> The question remains, do you have an opinion on:
>> The Rape of Nanking?
>> The Bataan Death March?
>> The Korean Comfort Women?
>> Unit 731?
>> The Rape of Manila?
>>
>> Surely you can answer this question.
> 
> I certainly can. Each is profoundly wrong. The perpetrators all deserved
> to be tried and punished for them. None of those actions, however,
> justify equivalent responses. 

So Japan's sneak attack on Pearl Harbor may have been wrong, but it did 
not justify the US waging war on Japan?

This wasn't a time of peace - it was a time of declared war that Japan 
started with various attacks throughout the Pacific.

How would you have brought the evil-doers to trial, had they won the war?

Offensive materials were developed to become more effective.  Airplanes 
got faster; they could carry more and bigger bombs.  Bombs got bigger 
and more destructive.  Bombsights were developed for more accurate 
delivery of bombs.  And then the A-bomb was developed.

The US ALREADY had 300,000 GI's dead or missing - and 300,000 wounded. 
Truman was NOT going to allow the Japanese to have their personal war on 
the army of invasion because the estimates of American deaths and 
casualties there would have exceeded the numbers to that date.

Here's what the army thought, as of 1998:
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/giangrec.htm

Truman was told prior to dropping the bombs that should the US invade 
Japan in Operation Downfall, beginning with Operation Olympic on Kyushu 
that Operation Olympic could result in up to 450,000 American 
casualties, with up to 100,000 American dead

And this does not count the estimated casualties of Operation Coronet to 
invade the main island of Honshu, which may have gone as high as 600,000 
additional American casualties with an additional 150,000 American dead.

So the total of American casualties in Operation Downfall could be as 
high as a million men, with 250,000 dead.  Certainly there would be no 
less than tens of thousands of new casualties and tens of thousands of 
new dead.

And we are not counting the Japanese casualties and dead.  Toward the 
war's end, the US Army kill ratio was five Japanese to one American.

AFAICT, dropping the A-bomb was the best way to end the war.  IMNSHO 
Truman would have been universally reviled afterwards as an American 
traitor had he gone ahead with Operation Downfall.

Here are estimates of the casualties of the war at its end:

Axis Forces

Country		Pop. 	Killed 	Wound   Total	Civ.
                         Missing         Milit	deaths
Germany  	78m 	3.5m  	4.6m 	8.1m 	2m
Italy  		44m 	330k  	? 	?  	70k
Japan  		72m 	1.75m 	? 	?  	350k
Rumania  	20m 	500k 	300k 	800k 	400k
Bulgaria  	6m 	10k 	? 	?  	50k
Hungary  	10m 	120k 	250k 	370k 	200k
Finland  	4m 	100k 	45k 	145k 	4k


Allied Forces

Country		Pop. 	Killed 	Wound   Total	Civ.
                         Missing         Milit	deaths

China  		450m  	1.3m  	1.8m 	3.1m  	9m
Poland          35m 	130k 	200k 	330k 	2.5m
U.K.  		48m 	400k 	300k  	700k  	60k
France  	42m 	250k 	350k 	600k 	270k
Australia  	7m 	30k 	40k 	70k 	--
India  		360m 	36k 	64k 	100k 	--
New Zealand 	2m  	10k 	20k 	30k 	--
So. Africa  	10m 	9k 	14k 	23k 	--
Canada  	11m 	42k 	50k 	92k 	--
Denmark 	4m 	2k 	? 	? 	1k
Norway 	3m 	10k 	? 	? 	6k	?
Belgium  	8m  	12k 	16k 	28k 	100k
Holland  	9m 	14k 	7k 	21k 	250k
Greece  	7m 	90k 	? 	? 	400k
Yugoslavia  	15m 	320k 	? 	? 	1.3m
U.S.S.R.  	194m 	9m 	18m  	27m 	19m
U.S.A. 		129m 	300k 	300k 	600k 	--

-- 
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
George Santayana, 1863 - 1952

Cheers,
Bama Brian
Libertarian
 




 939 Posts in Topic:
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cultural Supremacist <  2008-07-19 21:15:17 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Bill Bonde { ''Mr G  2008-07-20 02:20:02 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cultural Supremacist <  2008-07-19 21:33:06 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cultural Supremacist <  2008-07-19 21:37:51 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
nc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-19 21:28:48 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cultural Supremacist <  2008-07-20 10:24:17 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-19 22:37:43 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mr. Albritton <albritt  2008-07-19 21:43:32 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mahead the Mufti <mahe  2008-07-20 07:59:39 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RM V2.0" <B  2008-07-21 15:52:49 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-21 12:01:10 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mr. Albritton <albritt  2008-07-21 11:08:40 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-07-21 16:58:18 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mr. Albritton <albritt  2008-07-21 15:56:09 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RM V2.0" <B  2008-07-22 14:10:24 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mike <spamdump@[EMAIL   2008-07-21 16:22:40 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"** NewsByte **"  2008-07-21 12:02:42 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mike <spamdump@[EMAIL   2008-07-22 00:22:38 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-21 18:55:17 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Mike <spamdump@[EMAIL   2008-07-22 15:10:29 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-22 09:51:10 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RM V2.0" <B  2008-07-22 14:10:05 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-22 09:54:16 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-22 11:40:01 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-22 10:47:04 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-22 14:58:54 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-22 18:01:02 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-22 20:55:09 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-22 20:34:04 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-07-30 14:10:56 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-30 15:19:05 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-07-31 06:18:38 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 10:30:09 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
44@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ha  2008-07-31 11:59:15 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 11:22:28 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 13:31:37 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 12:51:50 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 19:57:58 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-31 22:13:50 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 08:37:34 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-01 09:03:14 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 09:36:13 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-01 10:42:02 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 13:13:51 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 19:50:20 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-01 14:05:23 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 19:43:08 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 15:17:58 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-02 14:30:05 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 21:24:25 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-02 18:51:43 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-03 11:09:46 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-03 18:18:56 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-04 16:30:29 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-05 05:16:43 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-05 13:53:05 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-05 23:56:20 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
"** NewsByte **"  2008-08-05 23:07:01 
Re: => Gray Ghost (Frank) truly an amoral repugnant piece of shi
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-06 10:46:49 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 19:16:39 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-08-01 12:59:22 
Re: Bama Brian says dropping NUKES on U$ Civilians is OK! <= bec
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-02 15:00:57 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 17:28:49 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 11:33:33 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:37:31 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 20:13:09 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 14:27:50 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 20:41:13 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:41:23 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 14:33:27 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 11:06:43 
Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says Shintoism and Hinduism
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 10:52:50 
Prof Jonez refuses to answer moral questions. Continues insane r
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 12:19:13 
Re: Prof Jonez refuses to answer moral questions. Continues insa
"torresD" <t  2008-07-31 12:22:06 
Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says Shintoism and Hinduism
Kerry Ladd <Gus@[EMAIL  2008-07-31 13:51:33 
Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says Shintoism and Hinduism
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 19:10:55 
Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says Shintoism and Hinduism
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:13:00 
Re: => Sociopath Gray Ghost (Frank) says Shintoism and Hinduism
Kerry Ladd <Gus@[EMAIL  2008-07-31 17:28:57 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:51:17 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 16:29:07 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"Felix D." <  2008-07-30 16:09:38 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"Billzz" <bi  2008-07-30 17:49:18 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-07-31 06:27:16 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 17:54:47 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= shou
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 14:14:51 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 16:31:54 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-31 21:59:32 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! -
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:13:42 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-22 21:27:55 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-22 20:52:04 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RSweeney" <  2008-07-22 23:46:33 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-22 22:22:29 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 03:12:29 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 09:16:54 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 12:37:42 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-23 19:00:12 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 14:26:23 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-23 17:48:14 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-24 00:38:39 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 00:50:04 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 20:26:51 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 00:59:56 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:34:24 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 20:33:12 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:01:15 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:50:41 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-24 06:14:56 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 09:55:09 
Re: Amoral Swine David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bomb
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-24 10:04:13 
Re: Amoral Swine David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bomb
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-24 15:25:08 
Re: Amoral Swine David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bomb
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 14:34:21 
Re: Amoral Swine David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bomb
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:40:44 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:39:39 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 21:17:25 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"RSweeney" <  2008-07-27 17:44:24 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-27 19:04:51 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
"RSweeney" <  2008-08-02 01:49:46 
Re: David Hartung can't find his Moral Compass -- Felons say Sup
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 20:23:43 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RSweeney" <  2008-07-23 19:48:42 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 21:21:53 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-08-06 08:20:21 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-08-14 09:24:20 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-08-14 11:57:29 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
"Morton Davis"   2008-08-15 03:48:51 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-08-15 06:57:57 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-15 07:21:44 
Re: David Hartung - Must be effective, he keeps getting attacked
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-08-14 09:25:36 
Re: David Hartung - Must be effective, he keeps getting attacked
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-08-14 11:54:22 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Mike Painter"   2008-07-22 21:25:37 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-22 22:26:38 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Mike Painter"   2008-07-22 22:35:50 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 09:13:22 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-23 00:41:00 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-22 22:48:39 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-23 01:03:36 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 09:15:13 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-23 16:13:09 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 15:07:45 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"RSweeney" <  2008-07-23 21:04:48 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 00:00:17 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 03:11:03 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 15:09:42 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Mike Painter"   2008-07-23 14:27:07 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-23 16:24:11 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 17:39:12 
Re: David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs on Civilian
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-23 17:19:07 
Re: David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs on Civilian
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 19:33:10 
Re: David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs on Civilian
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 21:15:00 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 00:02:28 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 01:29:15 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:23:06 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:49:37 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 01:31:36 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:25:14 
Re: Gray Ghost fucks himself again -- Felons say Supreme Court'
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:50:44 
Re: Amoral shitbag David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bo
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-23 23:59:42 
Re: Amoral shitbag David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bo
"Mike Painter"   2008-07-24 10:23:31 
Re: Amoral shitbag David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bo
jerry warner <jwarner@  2008-07-24 22:47:55 
Re: Amoral shitbag David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bo
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:33:09 
Re: David Hartung says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs on Civilian
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 21:09:09 
Re: Gray Ghost says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs on Civilians!
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 00:04:34 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 21:08:37 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 17:00:19 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 21:07:07 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:28:19 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 09:59:33 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-08-01 10:14:01 
Re: => Max Muir says "I want to bomb the civilians" with Nuclear
Max Muir <orb_at_cts_d  2008-07-30 22:59:38 
Re: => Max Muir says "I want to bomb the civilians" with Nuclear
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 11:00:17 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-07-23 13:23:44 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-23 10:15:04 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 04:25:25 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-23 11:45:53 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 11:28:51 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
fburton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-23 09:44:03 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-23 11:47:09 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-23 10:00:22 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
fburton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-23 17:23:48 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-23 16:44:44 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 11:25:22 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 14:39:54 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-07-23 13:36:49 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-23 19:00:56 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-07-24 11:08:46 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-24 17:23:46 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 21:46:51 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Bama Brian <bamaNOTbri  2008-07-25 13:17:54 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-30 09:12:40 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-30 16:52:55 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-30 10:57:20 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-30 18:07:13 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-30 13:45:21 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-30 21:17:56 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Rodney Long <rdlong@[E  2008-07-30 15:47:28 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 10:53:29 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-31 13:16:18 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-31 19:59:15 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-03 12:56:49 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-08-14 23:28:21 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex W." <i  2008-07-23 12:43:43 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 11:31:25 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-23 19:21:53 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-23 18:42:40 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-23 20:35:34 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-23 23:57:00 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 01:21:49 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:31:24 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:44:38 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
Chris Morton <cmorton@  2008-08-01 10:18:34 
Re: David Hartung confirms it's OK to drop NUCLEAR bombs upon Ci
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 19:16:25 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-24 00:43:57 
Re: DeadRat says it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Civili
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 01:36:44 
Re: DeadRat confirms it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Ci
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 11:46:51 
Re: DeadRat confirms it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Ci
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 20:46:36 
Re: DeadRat confirms it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Ci
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 22:18:43 
Re: DeadRat confirms it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Ci
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-25 07:37:10 
Re: DeadRat confirms it's morally acceptable to NUKE 100,000+ Ci
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-25 11:08:26 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 22:24:52 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-25 07:39:58 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 06:07:30 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-25 11:09:34 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
John Wetton <Asia@[EMA  2008-07-25 13:54:58 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Mike Painter"   2008-07-25 12:33:34 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-25 13:55:32 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-25 16:50:45 
Re: Gray Ghost (Frank) says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon C
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-25 18:02:07 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 18:14:57 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-25 18:05:06 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 19:14:22 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-25 19:53:47 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 20:59:12 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-07-25 19:20:31 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-25 19:53:07 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 20:55:10 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-07-25 20:55:50 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-26 06:12:13 
Re: DeadRatzo blows a gasket -- says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bom
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-26 01:18:21 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-26 13:53:55 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Alex W." <i  2008-07-25 23:59:17 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-25 19:19:49 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
"Alex W." <i  2008-07-26 12:47:41 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-07-26 07:36:30 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-25 08:27:30 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-26 20:57:14 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-27 05:07:06 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
hhyapster@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-07-27 20:33:00 
Re: Max Muir "I want to bomb the civilians" with Nuclear Weapons
Max Muir <orb_at_cts_d  2008-07-30 23:18:52 
Re: Pig-Ignorant Deluded Amerikkkans --- Felons say Supreme Cou
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-24 10:47:42 
Re: Pig-Ignorant Deluded Amerikkkans --- Felons say Supreme Cou
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 22:28:36 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Hiroshima Facts <hiros  2008-07-31 15:30:55 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Hiroshima Facts <hiros  2008-08-07 12:42:37 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-07 16:21:47 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-07 22:57:01 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
hhyapster@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-08-08 00:27:57 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-08 11:20:14 
Re: Max Muir says the 9.11 WTC attacks were justified -- Felons
hhyapster@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-07-25 02:41:18 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Max Muir <orb_at_cts_d  2008-07-24 09:31:54 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
Max Muir <orb_at_cts_d  2008-07-24 10:05:18 
Re: David Hartung - amoral coward looking for any excuse to NUKE
"William Black"  2008-07-24 23:32:12 
Re: Max Muir says the 9.11 WTC attacks were justified -- Felons
Max Muir <orb_at_cts_d  2008-07-24 10:35:20 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
judith <judithsmith@[E  2008-07-30 15:42:51 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-07-30 13:01:13 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-07-31 17:20:01 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 03:56:41 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 09:23:56 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 15:50:30 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 13:19:46 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-01 19:53:25 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-08-01 23:06:03 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 05:35:25 
Re: Violence Prone Gray Ghost (Frank) says dropping NUKES on Pro
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-08-02 14:54:09 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Paul Hyett <pah@[EMAIL  2008-07-24 08:26:44 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-07-24 10:52:23 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-24 21:46:23 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Reality_Check©"  2008-07-24 16:11:43 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-25 01:28:43 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 21:35:11 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
"Alex Cunningham&quo  2008-07-24 09:23:23 
Re: Felons say Supreme Court's ruling means they cannot be barre
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-07-24 21:33:08 
Re: DeadRatzo says it's OK to drop NUCLEAR Bombs upon Civilians
Hiroshima Facts <hiros  2008-07-30 04:59:42 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CHILDREN is OK! <= shoul
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-07-31 17:11:09 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Michael Ejercito <meje  2008-07-31 17:14:15 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-07-31 18:03:58 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-07-31 19:54:46 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-07-31 20:03:58 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 10:39:17 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 10:57:44 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 10:39:59 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 10:57:21 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Kerry Ladd <Gus@[EMAIL  2008-08-01 15:10:31 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 20:48:21 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 20:49:16 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 05:40:09 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-01 08:49:40 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 17:14:43 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 17:19:31 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 17:28:47 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 17:30:32 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 17:31:21 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-01 19:57:39 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 19:29:39 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 02:37:26 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 19:54:41 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 21:01:45 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 00:50:15 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 19:30:31 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 19:32:07 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-01 19:55:51 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 19:58:33 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 03:42:19 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 21:05:47 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 21:06:44 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-02 05:07:01 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-02 09:31:32 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-02 14:45:08 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-02 16:16:00 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-02 19:09:15 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-02 19:29:19 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-03 06:46:00 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-03 04:38:41 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Klaus Schadenfreude <k  2008-08-03 03:37:16 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-02 12:13:18 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-02 20:55:57 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
"Felix D." <  2008-08-01 21:04:45 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
DanielSan <danielsan@[  2008-08-01 21:06:20 
Re: Chris Morton says dropping NUKES on CIVILIANS is OK! <= beca
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-08-