On Apr 10, 10:19 pm, "Quran 47.4 When you meet the unbelievers in
Jihad, chop off their heads!" <Mohammedmcpi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 10, 5:19 pm, "*Anarcissie*" <anarcis...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 10, 3:07 pm, a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(PeterBP) wrote:
>
> > > *Anarcissie* <anarcis...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > On Apr 8, 1:11 pm, James A. Donald <jam...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > On Apr 6, 11:21 pm, James A. Donald
>
> > > > > > > Rather, I think that policies such as giving one hundred and
fifty
> > > > > > > million dollars to Fatah in return for them promising to
refrain from
> > > > > > > terrorizing anyone except Jews, in return for them promising
not to
> > > > > > > terrorize us, policies such as privileging Muslim polygamy
while
> > > > > > > puni****ng Christian polygamy, policies of giving the Muslim
religion
> > > > > > > special privileges on state property and in state funded
institutions
> > > > > > > while giving Christianity special disabilities and
restrictions in
> > > > > > > those same institutions, though they may postpone war, are
likely to
> > > > > > > result in the war being more severe and more apt to be
genocidal when
> > > > > > > it finally happens.
>
> > > > > > > Holy wars tend to be genocidal. Appeasement tends to result
in wars
> > > > > > > being bigger and more brutal when they happen. So when we
respond to
> > > > > > > holy war with appeasement ...
>
> > > > > > > If we look back to the early days of the republic at the
Indian wars,
> > > > > > > we saw plenty of political correctness and multiculturalism,
as for
> > > > > > > example the early federal government's settlement with the
> > > > > > > Chickamauga. It failed to take. I doubt it will take this
time
> > > > > > > around.
>
> > > > > "Quran 47.4 When you meet the unbelievers in Jihad, chop off
their
> > > > > heads!"
>
> > > > > > When do you get to the part of solutions?
>
> > > > > The solution is first to stop the dhimmitude here, and second to
> > > > > strike at our enemies wherever they may be: Starting with Osama
bin
> > > > > Laden, who is not in Afghanistan, and not in Iraq, but in safe
haven
> > > > > in our "ally" Pakistan.
>
> > > > If he's not dead, or vacationing on the Riviera. Or maybe he's
> > > > in New York in Trump Tower.
>
> > > > It would have been interesting if the US government had just
> > > > gone after Mr. bin Laden and his friends, instead of ginning up
> > > > all the mighty war and national-building crappola.
>
> > > > 1. No war in Afghanistan -- maybe a raid or two, but if bin Laden
> > > > was in Pakistan, why bother? The Taliban might well have been
> > > > glad to get rid of him, especially if the right people were paid
off.
>
> > > > 2. No war in Iraq.
>
> > > > 3. No war in Somalia.
>
> > > > 4. ....
>
> > > ...profit?
>
> > Overall, imperialism isn't profitable, but I guess Bush
> > and Cheney and their friends in the oil business may
> > have made some money.
>
> Prove it
Prove what? That imperialism isn't profitable overall, or
that Bush and Cheney and their friends in the oil business
may have made some money?
|
