Re: What is the point of hate laws?

In article
<9b1f93d8-1a11-471a-93e1-55fbc2ee0ac8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Benj  <bjacoby@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

[...]

>Hate crimes are in actual fact "thought crimes". And that implies
>political control!  Who can say with certainty that they know for sure
>what a persons thoughts are?  IF a person is shouting hate speech,
>that is certainly different than crime "motivated" by thoughts of
>hate?  Just look at the Yoo Kay and the way they criminalize
>investigations of the holocaust. Much of Europe does this. Since when

There are no laws, anywhere in the world, which "criminalize investigation
of the Holocaust."

There *are* laws which criminalize promulgation of NAZI propaganda, and
the denial of NAZI crimes against humanity. It is im****tant to understand
the difference.

>did historical events get elevated beyond any investigation?  And this
>goes double for the so-called holocaust where the books obviously have
>been cooked and people have money to make and axes to grind. Since

Which "books have been cooked?"

>when is history so holy that historians can't even study it?  It's all

History is never that "holy," and there are no laws, anywhere on earth,
which criminalize studying Holocaust historiography.


-- 
"Streicher commit suicide while in the Nuremberg Jail But you 
people did hang him after that"
(Kurt Knoll, Kitimat, B.C.'s Leading Revisionist Moron)
The Nizkor Project:                    http://www.nizkor.org/