Re: 9th Amendment: a dead letter?

In article <EJmdna5CxI0fr4bVnZ2dnUVZ_oqhnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 "Topp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <topprolmc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> "Larry" <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:x-1767B5.20574401052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> >  And there HAVE been gun control
> > statutes that have met this standard, whether you agree with the
court's
> > reasoning or not.
> 
> Cite.

I stand corrected.  As deadrat pointed out, "strict scrutiny" is not the 
standard for which these statutes are evaluated.

See, e.g., 
<http://www.acsblog.org/guest-bloggers-the-second-amendment-a-legal-conve
rsation-part-4.html>

> None would pass strict scrutiny, since NONE show they
fixed/reduced/saved
> whatever they were implemented for...

They don't have to pass strict scrutiny, so you've set up a nice 
strawman to sup****t your position.