Re: 9th Amendment: a dead letter?

Larry wrote:
> In article <H8QSj.107$aA1.29@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  "Scout" <me4guns@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> "Larry" <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:x-CDE4FD.21502402052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> In article <K4PSj.13965$Bb3.13867@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>> "Scout" <me4guns@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Deadrat" <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:6vOSj.119$nl7.45@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "Herb Martin" <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:481baa29$1$30516
>>>>> $4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Larry" <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:x-0A155A.19143502052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> In article <6TMSj.1591$qW.514@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>> "Scout" <me4guns@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why is it everyone here thinks that the "strict scrutiny" standard
is
>>>>>>> the windfall by which all laws fail?
>>>>>> Name a gun control law that has or can pass "Strict Scrutiny"?
>>>>> Do you have a cite that says that gun control laws must pass strict
>>>>> scrutiny?
>>>>> <snip>
>>>> The Constitution of the United States of America.
>>>>
>>>> Unless you are going to tell us it's not a set of law, but rather a
list 
>>>> of
>>>> suggestions.
>>> Where within that source does the phrase "strict scrutiny" appear?
>> Quite right. I accept your admission that ANY violation of our rights
is 
>> contrary to the language of the Constitution.
>>
>> There. Happy?
>>
>> I mean I was willing to give you a little slack, but seems you want to
hold 
>> me right to the letter of the Constitution.
> 
> Why can't I go to the governor's mansion and protest in his bedroom?  I 
> mean, I have the right to free speech, and not letting me speak in his 
> bedroom is a violation of my rights!

Until it infringes upon the equal rights of another...