"Larry" <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:x-F5780A.22462202052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <H8QSj.107$aA1.29@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "Scout" <me4guns@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Quite right. I accept your admission that ANY violation of our rights
is
>> contrary to the language of the Constitution.
>>
>> There. Happy?
>>
>> I mean I was willing to give you a little slack, but seems you want to
>> hold
>> me right to the letter of the Constitution.
>
> Why can't I go to the governor's mansion and protest in his bedroom? I
> mean, I have the right to free speech, and not letting me speak in his
> bedroom is a violation of my rights!
You really have wasted your father's money on a substandard education
if you don't know this one OR if you don't know that it doesn't apply.
There is a difference between a relevant point and mere fallacious
argument, but someone lawyers never seem to understand this
fact.
Your rights end where my right begin.
You CAN go and protest, just not necessarily WHERE you choose
if it violates someone elses rights unreasonably.
I have already suggested that you might look to the Right to Peacably
Assemble for just the type of infringements that are in fact within
the bounds of the Constitution.
You cannot break into my house to eat, sleep, speak, or use your RKBA
either, but that doesn't prevent your from exercising your rights on your
own property or in public areas.
You cannot be stopped from "assembling" on the mere pretext of
"public safety" but you can be made to conform with fire marshall
laws to do so safely.
Parade permits are (possibly) legal, but they MUST be issued
to EVERYONE fairly, and the mere fact that a permit is required
for (demonstrable) safety reasons CANNOT be used to prevent
the Free Speech or Freedom to Assemble you enjoy.
Laws that require Concealed Carry (CHL etc) permits MIGHT be
written so as to be constitutional but I don't know of any except that
in Alaska.
Certainly no one has shown that they provide any useful public
safety function. Feel free to try if you wish.
None of the CDC, the National Academy of Sciences, nor DoJ
was able to find that ANY gun control reduces VIOLENT CRIME,
SUICIDE or ACCIDENTS in any significant manner.
Whenever gun control laws are reviewed, they always come out as
either making "no difference" or actually making crime, murder,
etc WORSE.
Either way, they cannot meet the test -- apparently.
|
