Re: 9th Amendment: a dead letter?

"Deadrat" <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:y%SSj.77$7k7.3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Herb Martin" <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:481bef38$1$30509$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>
>> "Larry" <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:x-FCAC73.23181602052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> In article <KEQSj.98422$Er2.66711@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>> Magus <nope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>
>>>> > Why can't I go to the governor's mansion and protest in his
>>>> > bedroom?  I mean, I have the right to free speech, and not letting
>>>> > me speak in his bedroom is a violation of my rights!
>>>>
>>>> Until it infringes upon the equal rights of another...
>>>
>>> Ahhh, so the rights aren't absolute.  Got it.
>>
>> Absolutely -- and strict strutiny is the usual CORRECT TEST
>> to determine if a right is being correctly or unconstitutionally
>> infriged.
>>
>> Got it?
>
> I've got it if that's your personal opinion.
>
> Is it the law?  If so, could you back up that claim?

You can easily determine if you honestly care that this is the
correct test for infringing rights.

Rights are not absolute, but efforts to abrogate them must
meet such tests, especially if those rights are fundamental.

But you knew that already so your feigned ignorance is
merely disingenous.