In article <481c8602$1$30484$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
"Herb Martin" <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Larry" <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:x-CFCB78.11231803052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In article <7cTSj.2867$_.1050@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > Magus <nope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> Deadrat wrote:
> >> > Magus <nope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> >> > news:aYPSj.68898$Q52.4211@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
>
>
> >> There *are* departments of the federal police, they just aren't named
> >> "police departments".
> >
> > Once again a resort to a dictionary definition as authority. Why does
> > everyone do this?
> >
> > There is no federal police department. There is no general federal
> > police power. There are, of course, federal law enforcement agencies
> > that enforce the laws that are within the jurisdiction of the federal
> > government to enact, but a police department that does not make.
> >
> > Get it?
>
> Ok, so there are Federal Law Enforcement Agencies but no police?
Now you're getting closer.
|
