"Larry" <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:x-BE8F70.11411103052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <481c8544$1$30495$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "Herb Martin" <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> "Larry" <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:x-3EC74A.11185703052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > In article <481bf7fd$1$30525$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> > "Herb Martin" <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >
>>
>> >> >> "Larry" <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:x-ABE977.22563802052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> > In article <481bd30f$0$30518$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >> >> > "Herb Martin" <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Failure on account of fallacious appeal to authority on your
>> >> >> >> part.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Everything about the law is, by definition, an appeal to
>> >> >> > authority,
>> >> >> > you
>> >> >> > do realize?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Perhaps, but EITHER you KNOW the above statement is being
>> >> >> used by your in the wrong context -- we were discussing your
>> >> >> MERE appeal to authority for authorities sake, a well known
>> >> >> logical fallacy -- and you were being DISHONEST OR you
>> >> >> have not learned how to engage in an honest debate and so
>> >> >> have paid a lot for a substandard legal education while remaining
>> >> >> tree stump stupid.
>> >> >
>> >> > You claimed the RKBA is an individual right.
>> >> > I said it was a collective right.
>> >> > You said it wasn't and challenged me to name a collective right.
>> >> > I said the RKBA.
>> >>
>> >> And thereby demonstrated your intellectual dishonesty.
>> >>
>> >> So, when you can name a few more generally accepted "collective
>> >> rights" let us know....
>> >
>> >
>> > If you were to claim the Earth was flat, that doesn't open up the
issue
>> > for debate. It isn't.
>>
>> No, but then you would be able to give evidence that is was NOT
>> flat, and show multiple examples of other planets that are spheroid,
>> but you still cannot name a list commonly accepted "collective rights"
>> and by now it is obvious you never will.
>
> I never said there were many of them - but Deadrat did cite a few for
> you last night, which I notice you didn't comment on.
I have yet to see a list of "collective" rights.
Please do post them or have Deadrat do so.
>> Doesn't really irritate you to to learn that someone who merely read
>> the sources knows more about both Constitutional law and the logic
>> of debate than your education provided you?
>
> It doesn't irritate me, because it isn't true. I feel sorry for you,
> actually, living in the ignorance that you do.
Do you think?
|
