"Herb Martin" <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:481c5f77$1$30499
$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Scout" <me4guns@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:3sYSj.1246$sp.1187@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "Deadrat" <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:mHRSj.50$7k7.41@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> >> By your logic, anyone should be allowed to own anything that
could
>>>>> >> possibly be used as a weapon. Where can I get myself a couple
of
>>>>> >> hand grenades?
>
> No, by Scout's logic everyone law-abiding should be able to own
> (and carry) the weapons commonly carried by criminals AND by
> the police.
>
>
>>>>> > Gun control: the theory that a 90lb woman has the rigbt to use
her
>>>>> > fists to fight off a 210lb rapist.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's just number them, OK.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Guns don't kill people; people kill people.
>>>>> 2. Criminals don't obey laws; why have them?
>>>>> 3. The 2nd Amendment is an individual right.
>>>>> and so on.
>>>>
>>>> Its good to see you've found a way to ignore the simple things.
Fine,
>>>> I'll do the whole spiel since you seem wholly incapable of filling
in
>>>> the blanks for yourself Without weapons, a small woman has no
ability
>>>> to defend herself against a large man. a pistol is capable of
>>>> leveling the playing field between a 210lb man and a 90lb woman as
few
>>>> other weapons are capable of doing. Gun control robs her of any
>>>> realistic op****tunity to actually defend herself.
>>>
>>> This is manifestly false. Handgun prohibition, as opposed to say,
>>> registration, may do this.
>>
>> Registration.....registration...where have I heard that before.....oh,
>> that's right...Wa****ngton DC where registration was used to impose a
>> handgun
>> prohibition.
>
> Maybe in NY City? Oh, wait, they did it there too.
And your point?
Did you register your car? Did they take it away?
|
