In article <zY1Tj.2215$qW.923@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
"Scout" <me4guns@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Larry" <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:x-3EC74A.11185703052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In article <481bf7fd$1$30525$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > "Herb Martin" <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> "Larry" <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> news:x-FC9C60.00433303052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > In article <481bec74$1$30478$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >> > "Herb Martin" <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Larry" <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> >> news:x-ABE977.22563802052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> > In article <481bd30f$0$30518$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >> >> > "Herb Martin" <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Failure on account of fallacious appeal to authority on your
part.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Everything about the law is, by definition, an appeal to
authority,
> >> >> > you
> >> >> > do realize?
> >> >>
> >> >> Perhaps, but EITHER you KNOW the above statement is being
> >> >> used by your in the wrong context -- we were discussing your
> >> >> MERE appeal to authority for authorities sake, a well known
> >> >> logical fallacy -- and you were being DISHONEST OR you
> >> >> have not learned how to engage in an honest debate and so
> >> >> have paid a lot for a substandard legal education while remaining
> >> >> tree stump stupid.
> >> >
> >> > You claimed the RKBA is an individual right.
> >> > I said it was a collective right.
> >> > You said it wasn't and challenged me to name a collective right.
> >> > I said the RKBA.
> >>
> >> And thereby demonstrated your intellectual dishonesty.
> >>
> >> So, when you can name a few more generally accepted "collective
> >> rights" let us know....
> >
> >
> > If you were to claim the Earth was flat, that doesn't open up the
issue
> > for debate. It isn't.
>
> If the issue weren't resolved then it certainly would. The issue of the
2nd
> hasn't been resolved.
Only because "the issue" of the second amendment is an overbroad
statement. It isn't resolved in the same exact way that new issues
arising under the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, or any other amendment
haven't been resolved either.
However, every case before the Supreme Court in which there has been an
issue regarding the second amendment has been resolved.
Whether it was resolved in a way you agree with, however, is a different
matter. And irrelevant towards the question.
> Indeed evidence would tend to indicate that you are on
> the "Flat Earth" side of the debate and asserting that the Earth is Flat
> proves your case.
>
> A lame response. Even for a so called lawyer.
|
