"Bo Raxo" <crimenewscenter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:0sCdnVoVRJYLTIPVnZ2dnUVZ_oesnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "the big dog" <thebygdog@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
news:e7f812f2-be88-4829-ac50-d3a65b33d873@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On May 5, 8:14 am, "Bo Raxo" <crimenewscen...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> "the big dog" <thebyg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>
messagenews:5517c2a8-d415-477b-8256-244d521d91a6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >
>>>
>>> > How on earth can a crowd of people be intimidated in any fa****on
>>> > whatsoever by a goddamn symbol? It's ridiculous and infantile.
>>>
>>> Because it can be construed as a threat of real violence. Like, say,
if
>>> there was a history of black people being lynched....duh. Murders of
>>> complete strangers for reasons of race (and ***ual orientation) still
>>> occur
>>> today, or aren't you aware of that?
>>
>> In public? surrounded by scores of other folk of similar race? For
>> gods sake, grow a pair and learn to live in a free society, or move to
>> one that is more to your liking.a
>
> Dimwit, while the symbol of the threat may be in a public place with
> plenty of witnesses, that doesn't mean the violence will be carried out
> right then and there. Do you think James Byrd was killed in broad
> daylight? Have you never heard of the history of lynchings - often
> carried out in the dead of night, when a victim was caught out at night
or
> dragged from his home.
Females are ***ually harrassed in public all the time. I don't see you
griping about that sort of 'freedom of speech'.
|
