Re: The Pharma Vaccine Franchise is a Product of Marketing, Not ?Science

In message
<e4bd20bf-1b1b-484c-9c4e-00a7b093f341@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Citizen Jimserac wrote:

> CONTRARIWISE, my dear Richard you shock me because I don't believe
> that YOU can provide me with the DOUBLE BLIND PLACEBO tests to prove
> your assertion at all.
> IS this some sort of DOUBLE STANDARD - you expect double blind placebo
> studies for Homeopathy but NOT for PROOF THAT VACCINATION WORKS?????

You've already been pointed at the mother of all studies.
You also have obviously not bothered to read it, which means
that answering more challenges like it is an exercise in
hoop-jumping.

As below:

> As PeterB stated, and I quote from his recent post:
> "Estimates of the duration of vaccine-induced immunity (when it
> occurs)
> are based on little more than field surveys, not controlled studies
> that adjust for factors unique to a particular demographic, such as
> nutritional status, age, or prior disease history.  Any risk-adjusted
> outcomes related to mass vaccination (especially in terms of adverse
> health effects attributable to vaccine) remain largely unknown".

In other words, "we can keep making up more and more hurdles to
throw at you forever, each an excuse to deny that you have met
the always-receding goal of having enough evidence to sup****t
your point."  PB was good enough to admit today that this is
a total double standard and only applies to those with whom he
disagrees.

Well, child, the whole game of always asking "why?" no matter
what the answer was pretty clever at about two years old.
For those who haven't outgrown being amused by conversational
power games, I wish you happiness.

-- 
| **** happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
+--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---+