Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Medicine > Re: Amanda Peet...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 21 Topic 8794 of 9230
Post > Topic >>

Re: Amanda Peet (and the S****-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medical

by Jeff <jeff.utz@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 25, 2008 at 09:57 AM

On Jul 25, 12:03=A0pm, Ilena Rose <B...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Disbarred NY attorney, and vapid S****-oil Vigilante, Vaccination
> Liar, repeated the identical lies that others from Quackwatch and the
> Healthfrauds have been spreading:

Personal attack noted.

> "This is the Poling case, where the child had a mitochondrial disorder
> that, after vaccinations, led to autism-like sysmptoms, not autism.
> Reading the original decesion shows just that. "
>
> WRONG
> WRONG
> WRONG

=46rom the ruling:

"Medical personnel at the Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation,
Department of Health and Human Services (DVIC) have reviewed the facts
of this case, as presented by the petition, medical records, and
affidavits. After a thorough review, DVIC has concluded that
compensation is appropriate in this case.

"In sum, DVIC has concluded that the facts of this case meet the
statutory criteria for demonstrating that the vaccinations CHILD
received on July 19, 2000, significantly aggravated an underlying
mitochondrial disorder, which predisposed her to deficits in cellular
energy metabolism, and manifested as a regressive encephalopathy with
features of autism spectrum disorder. Therefore, respondent recommends
that compensation be awarded to petitioners in accordance with 42
U.S.C. =A7 300aa-11(c)(1)(C)(ii)."

You can read the full ruling here:
http://www.ageofautism.com/2008/02/full-=
text-autis.html.

So Mark was right on. The ruling clearly didn't say that the child had
autism.

Have a lovely day,

Jeff

<...>
 




 21 Posts in Topic:
Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medical Es
Ilena Rose <BIA@[EMAIL  2008-07-22 10:31:31 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
Ilena Rose <BIA@[EMAIL  2008-07-25 10:03:07 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
Jeff <jeff.utz@[EMAIL   2008-07-25 09:57:57 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-25 11:33:35 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
Ilena Rose <BIA@[EMAIL  2008-07-25 11:44:22 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
Jeff <jeff.utz@[EMAIL   2008-07-25 10:59:34 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-25 11:36:34 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-25 11:37:41 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
jurimed2@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-26 09:49:23 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
Bob Badour <bbadour@[E  2008-07-26 14:48:39 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
"D. C. Sessions"  2008-07-26 12:54:19 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
wright@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-08-23 15:52:28 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
"Frankly, my dear&qu  2008-09-01 00:12:59 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-27 11:15:51 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
Mike <Mike@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-29 03:34:11 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-27 11:16:17 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-29 14:11:14 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
Mike <Mike@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-30 02:37:10 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
"Jan Drew" <  2008-07-30 00:56:59 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-30 14:39:27 
Re: Amanda Peet (and the Snake-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medica
Mike <Mike@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-31 04:20:12 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 3:32:09 CST 2008.