On Sat, 10 May 2008 19:24:02 GMT, Al Smith <invalid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 May 2008 13:50:43 GMT, Al Smith <invalid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> Obama would be nuts to saddle himself with Hillary
(and Bill). Obama
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> doesn't need her -- she needs him.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> -Al-
>>>>>>>> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>> >> Exactly. She would bring nothing to the ticket. He needs
a Westerner. Bill
>>>>>>>> >>>> >> Richardson. And Senator Clinton can be very valuable as a
Senator.
>>>>>>>> >>>> >>
>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>> >>> >Senator Clinton hasn't shown any ability to lead (in the
Senate). In
>>>>>> >>> >fact, her record is one of being a great follower. She
followed Bush
>>>>>> >>> >into war and praised his idiocy for years.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> And then there is the flip side. With Senator Clinton's
background
>>>> >> she understands the sworn responsibility of Presidents - to
protect
>>>> >> the United States people.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >Hillary Clinton is an exceptionally intelligent woman, but she's in
>>> >bed with the special interests and the lobbies. Were she to get into
>>> >office, it would be the same old dance for another four years.
>>> >America really needs a fresh direction. I don't know if Obama can
>>> >provide it or not, but I know for certain that it won't come from
>>> >Hillary or McCain.
>>> >
>>> >-Al-
>>
>> If you are suggesting that Obama's "fresh direction" is to not want to
>> protect the United States people, then I would fully agree.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Are you serious? I mean, really, are you serious? Because if you are
>serious about what you just wrote, your mind is so far removed from
>rationality that it would be futile to talk to you. I assume by
>"protect the United States people" you mean launch op****tunistic
>wars of aggression against non-threatening foreign nations on the
>other side of the world. What do such wars, and their subsequent
>hostile military occupations, have to do with protecting the people
>of America? Nothing. Then do just the opposite -- they *endanger*
>Americans both at home and abroad. Jesus, you must be one of those
>24% who still sup****t Bush and his gang of cutthroats.
When you think up an argument that sup****ts your original (false)
assertions of Obama, post back...
>-Al-
|
