On Jul 10, 9:35=A0pm, Gary Renzetti <lizg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Can you tell me why building the wall on the Green Line
> > would not be a "defacto border marker"?
>
> Why would I want to do that? If the zionist state is going to continue
> to exist, the 1967 cease-fire line (the Green Line) should indeed be the
> defacto border. For me to argue otherwise, I would have to disagree with
> myself.
It's Israel, not "the zionist state" or "zionist entity".
As far as the Green Line being the defacto border, it should be noted
that the Arabs never even spoke about it being a border between Israel
and the Palestinian Arab state until they no longer controlled it (as
a result, incidentally, of a war that they unilaterally started).
Then, all of a sudden, it became the border (but even then, not
really, as the Arabs then deny it's the border by denying Israel the
right to control immigration across and citizen****p within the
border).
|
