Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Misc > A policy that a...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 66 Topic 176404 of 197778
Post > Topic >>

A policy that all Republicans can get behind

by gjohns01@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jun 24, 2008 at 08:06 PM

Just watch usenet Republicans come to the defense of this policy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/25/wa****ngton/24cnd-justice.html?_r=3D1&hp&o=
ref=3Dslogin

    Justice Department officials over the last six years illegally
used "political or ideological" factors to hire new lawyers into an
elite recruitment program, tapping law school graduates with
conservative credentials over those with liberal-sounding resumes, a
new re****t found Tuesday.

    The blistering re****t, prepared by the Justice Department=92s
inspector general, is the first in what will be a series of
investigations growing out of last year=92s scandal over the firings of
nine United States attorneys. It appeared to confirm for the first
time in an official examination many of the allegations from critics
who charged that the Justice Department had become overly politicized
during the Bush administration.

    "Many qualified candidates" were rejected for the department=92s
honors program because of what was perceived as a liberal bias, the
re****t found. Those practices, the re****t concluded, "constituted
misconduct and also violated the department=92s policies and civil
service law that prohibit discrimination in hiring based on political
or ideological affiliations."
 




 66 Posts in Topic:
A policy that all Republicans can get behind
gjohns01@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-24 20:06:31 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
4095 Dead <zepp2211409  2008-06-24 20:52:26 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Steve <stevencanyon@[E  2008-06-25 06:07:05 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
hans_not_here@[EMAIL PROT  2008-06-25 18:40:12 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Foxtrot <foxtrot@[EMAI  2008-06-24 21:37:22 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
David Johnston <david@  2008-06-28 21:07:36 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Foxtrot <foxtrot@[EMAI  2008-06-28 15:21:39 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-06-28 15:33:05 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
David Johnston <david@  2008-06-29 01:28:51 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Foxtrot <foxtrot@[EMAI  2008-06-30 21:48:59 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
David Johnston <david@  2008-07-01 06:27:49 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Ernst Blofeld <blofeld  2008-06-24 22:41:05 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Jeffrey Turner <jturne  2008-06-25 08:54:21 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Ernst Blofeld <blofeld  2008-06-25 09:11:37 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Jeffrey Turner <jturne  2008-06-25 20:46:03 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
gjohnsit@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-25 12:48:16 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
bw@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B1  2008-06-25 21:53:27 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Ernst Blofeld <blofeld  2008-06-25 18:01:03 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Jeffrey Turner <jturne  2008-06-28 12:32:39 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Stevie Nichts <nix2nic  2008-06-25 18:24:35 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
4105 Dead <zepp2211410  2008-06-25 18:42:18 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Ernst Blofeld <blofeld  2008-06-25 18:30:11 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
hans_not_here@[EMAIL PROT  2008-06-25 21:32:37 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Jeffrey Turner <jturne  2008-06-28 12:12:28 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Raymond <Bluerhymer@[E  2008-06-25 18:37:15 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Stevie Nichts <nix2nic  2008-06-25 19:22:57 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Ernst Blofeld <blofeld  2008-06-25 20:07:55 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Stevie Nichts <nix2nic  2008-06-26 20:05:57 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Ernst Blofeld <blofeld  2008-06-28 10:31:44 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Ernst Blofeld <blofeld  2008-06-28 10:33:11 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Jeffrey Turner <jturne  2008-06-29 11:44:21 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Ernst Blofeld <blofeld  2008-06-29 08:46:57 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Jeffrey Turner <jturne  2008-06-30 11:19:53 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Stevie Nichts <nix2nic  2008-06-30 16:48:19 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-06-30 17:10:10 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
linder.one@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-01 17:00:44 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-07-01 14:46:55 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
linder.one@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-02 16:43:04 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-07-02 10:45:50 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
linder.one@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-03 12:31:44 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Jeffrey Turner <jturne  2008-07-01 10:39:07 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Stevie Nichts <nix2nic  2008-06-30 19:41:28 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-06-30 22:19:13 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Jeffrey Turner <jturne  2008-07-01 10:35:06 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
linder.one@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-01 17:02:12 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Jeffrey Turner <jturne  2008-07-01 15:02:30 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
linder.one@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-01 20:54:29 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Jeffrey Turner <jturne  2008-07-02 11:53:09 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
linder.one@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-02 16:41:15 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Jeffrey Turner <jturne  2008-07-03 18:55:47 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Steve <stevencanyon@[E  2008-07-03 19:20:55 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
linder.one@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-04 11:24:01 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Jeffrey Turner <jturne  2008-07-04 14:47:10 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
linder.one@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-06 11:44:25 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Jeffrey Turner <jturne  2008-07-06 10:39:58 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
linder.one@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-07 11:57:41 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Jeffrey Turner <jturne  2008-07-07 15:05:21 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
linder.one@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-08 12:47:49 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Jeffrey Turner <jturne  2008-07-08 20:45:57 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
linder.one@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-09 11:33:48 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-07-01 14:46:14 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
linder.one@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-02 16:41:59 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-07-02 10:45:54 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
linder.one@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-03 12:30:20 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
Stevie Nichts <nix2nic  2008-07-01 10:56:58 
Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-07-01 15:03:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 10:25:01 CST 2008.